2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42399-020-00309-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Self-compassion Scale-Short Form: Stronger Associations with Self-inadequacy and Resilience

Abstract: The Self-compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF) was developed as an economical alternative for the Self-compassion Scale (SCS), one of the few scales to assess self-compassion. Despite the active use of the SCS-SF, a psychometric evaluation of this scale remains limited. This study analysed the factor structure, reliability, and construct validity of the SCS-SF in UK university student populations. Of 365 students approached, 333 completed the SCS-SF and other measures including negative psychological constructs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
32
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies included in this systematic review, selfcompassion was measured using the SCS (Neff, 2003b) and SCS-SF (Raes et al, 2011). While these measures are commonly used in self-compassion research (López et al, 2015), the appropriateness of SCS and SCS-SF as a measurement for self-compassion has been questioned (López et al, 2015;Kotera and Sheffield, 2020). For example, the negative subscales of SCS have been shown to be more strongly related to depression, stress and rumination than the positive ones (López et al, 2015), and the originally proposed factor structure of the SCS-SF (Raes et al, 2011) was not replicated in a study of UK university students (Kotera and Sheffield, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the studies included in this systematic review, selfcompassion was measured using the SCS (Neff, 2003b) and SCS-SF (Raes et al, 2011). While these measures are commonly used in self-compassion research (López et al, 2015), the appropriateness of SCS and SCS-SF as a measurement for self-compassion has been questioned (López et al, 2015;Kotera and Sheffield, 2020). For example, the negative subscales of SCS have been shown to be more strongly related to depression, stress and rumination than the positive ones (López et al, 2015), and the originally proposed factor structure of the SCS-SF (Raes et al, 2011) was not replicated in a study of UK university students (Kotera and Sheffield, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these measures are commonly used in self-compassion research (López et al, 2015), the appropriateness of SCS and SCS-SF as a measurement for self-compassion has been questioned (López et al, 2015;Kotera and Sheffield, 2020). For example, the negative subscales of SCS have been shown to be more strongly related to depression, stress and rumination than the positive ones (López et al, 2015), and the originally proposed factor structure of the SCS-SF (Raes et al, 2011) was not replicated in a study of UK university students (Kotera and Sheffield, 2020). Future studies in this area may thus benefit from assessing selfcompassion using scales such as the Relational Compassion Systematic Review About Self-Compassion Training Scale (Hacker, 2008) or Compassionate Engagement and Action Scales (Gilbert et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more representative sample should be used for future research. In addition, self-compassion was measured using the Self-Compassion Scale—Short Form [ 35 ]; however, there is doubt as to its validity [ 66 ]. Further, our variables were measured using self-reported scales, which restricts the reliability of participant responses [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, measuring these constructs using self-report measures might compromise their accuracy (e.g. response bias [Kotera et al 2020a], and validity [Kotera and Sheffield 2020]). Additional qualitative data (e.g.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%