2007
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities?

Abstract: International audienceThe aim of this article is to reflect upon the emergence of the 'third mission' of universities as a critical (but not new) dimension of university activities. It recalls the role of our changing understanding of knowledge diffusion and circulation in its growth. It then focuses on the four main lessons derived from the analysis of the different dimensions of the so-called 'third mission' to underline the tensions generated with the other missions. This leads us to suggest a move from thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
275
0
44

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
275
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…A funding allocation system was eventually adopted which made it an explicit requirement for universities to collect Third Stream activity data. 4 These incentives came in addition to funding opportunities managed by local governments and (until 2010) by regional development agencies (RDAs) as part of knowledge exchange initiatives and regeneration strategies which combined to give the third mission of universities a strong territorial dimension expressed in most universities' mission statements (Chatterton and Goddard 2000;Laredo 2007). …”
Section: Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A funding allocation system was eventually adopted which made it an explicit requirement for universities to collect Third Stream activity data. 4 These incentives came in addition to funding opportunities managed by local governments and (until 2010) by regional development agencies (RDAs) as part of knowledge exchange initiatives and regeneration strategies which combined to give the third mission of universities a strong territorial dimension expressed in most universities' mission statements (Chatterton and Goddard 2000;Laredo 2007). …”
Section: Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different perspective was proposed by Laredo (2007). He suggested shifting the discourse from three institutional missions of universities to three functions, namely (i) the tertiary education of large numbers of students, (ii) professionally specialized higher-education and research, and (iii) academic training and research output.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a knowledge-based economy, variation is just as important on the demand side as it is on the supply side (Laredo, 2007). Before one focuses on success stories about "building bridges," the rich varieties on both banks of the river can be made visible for different audiences so that more options for innovations can be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debated causes of the divide include the concentration of research and the actual cost-effectiveness of the division of labour at the individual and institution levels [Clark, 1997;Maassen, Stensaker, 2011;Pinheiro et al, 2014]. Secondly, the link between research and innovation has been explored through studies of research collaboration [Sonnenwald, 2007;Bozeman, Boardman, 2014], university-industry interactions [Mansfield, 1998;Scott et al, 2001;Perkmann, Walsh, 2007;Perkmann et al, 2013], modes of knowledge production [Gibbons et al, 1994], the triple helix [Etzkowitz, Leydesdorff, 2000], the entrepreneurial university [Clark, 1998], the third mission of universities [Laredo, 2007;Pinheiro et al, 2015] and the position of universities in innovation systems [Fagerberg, Verspagen, 2009;Jacobsson, Perez Vico, 2010]. Many such studies describe the productive complementarity [Gulbrandsen, Smeby, 2005;D'Este, Perkmann, 2011;Wigren-Kristoferson et al, 2011;Fogelberg, Lundqvist, 2012], and underline the embeddedness of innovation in research [Etzkowitz, Leydesdorff, 2000;Pinheiro et al, 2015].…”
Section: Master Classmentioning
confidence: 99%