Staging Death 2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783110480573-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Tomb: Mortuary Practices in Habitation Areas in the Transition to the Late Bronze Age at Kirrha, Phocis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sites are of special significance to the understanding of social dynamics in the so called "transitional" period from Middle to Late Bronze Age on the Greek mainland. The changing burial customs observed in both sites reflect a vibrant discourse between the past, present and future, well in accordance with the changing social landscape of this seminal period at the dawn of the Mycenaean civilization (Lagia et al, 2016;Moutafi and Voutsaki, 2016). Hence, Kirrha and Ayios Vasileios are ideal sites to investigate the connection between individual mobility and changing traditions and were thus included to evaluate the applicability of the baselines calculated for Greece herein for future mobility studies.…”
Section: Archaeological Sitesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both sites are of special significance to the understanding of social dynamics in the so called "transitional" period from Middle to Late Bronze Age on the Greek mainland. The changing burial customs observed in both sites reflect a vibrant discourse between the past, present and future, well in accordance with the changing social landscape of this seminal period at the dawn of the Mycenaean civilization (Lagia et al, 2016;Moutafi and Voutsaki, 2016). Hence, Kirrha and Ayios Vasileios are ideal sites to investigate the connection between individual mobility and changing traditions and were thus included to evaluate the applicability of the baselines calculated for Greece herein for future mobility studies.…”
Section: Archaeological Sitesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This study integrates taphonomy, archaeothanatology, forensic anthropology and social anthropology, and identifies a considerable degree of variation in funerary disposal and secondary treatment of the deceased. Similarly, Anna Lagia, in her work on Middle Bronze Age Kouphovouno in Laconia (ID1890) and Kirrha in Phokis (ID5430, ID4473; Cavanagh et al 2016;Lagia et al 2016), has recognized human remains which were exhumed and reburied. This is contrary to the dominant view of there being single articulated burials at this period, and suggests multi-stage funerary rituals where the grave was perceived as a place of continuous revisitation by the living.…”
Section: Funerary Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on the treatment of the dead in Prepalatial and Protopalatial Crete form part of a broader trend in Aegean archaeology, which has witnessed, since the beginning of the 21 st century, a growing interest in bioarchaeological approaches to mortuary practices (e.g. Triantaphyllou 2001: 47-65;Lagia et al 2016;Moutafi & Voutsaki 2016;Jones 2018;Papakonstantinou et al 2020;Moutafi 2021). In particular, such approaches have demonstrated that commingled deposits from Early Mycenaean and Mycenaean collective tombs (17 ème -13 ème centuries BC) are the product of multiple forms of manipulations (Moutafi & Voutsaki 2016;Jones 2018;Moutafi 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%