2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3366195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Utsira Saline Aquifer CO2 Storage Resources Using the SRMS Classification Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…number of well penetrations. studies (Holloway, 1996;Bøe et al, 2002;Chadwick et al, 2008;Halland et al, 2011;Thibeau & Mucha 2011;Pham et al, 2013a;Gasda et al, 2017;Thibeau et al, 2018). We do not provide the storage capacity for areas of the aquifer outside of structural traps, even though they may have suitable properties for storage (positive CC and > 700 m depth).…”
Section: Prospect Storage Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…number of well penetrations. studies (Holloway, 1996;Bøe et al, 2002;Chadwick et al, 2008;Halland et al, 2011;Thibeau & Mucha 2011;Pham et al, 2013a;Gasda et al, 2017;Thibeau et al, 2018). We do not provide the storage capacity for areas of the aquifer outside of structural traps, even though they may have suitable properties for storage (positive CC and > 700 m depth).…”
Section: Prospect Storage Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the FRT, storage efficiency estimates for aquifers (total pore volume) typically range from 2 to 8% (May et al, 2005), but can be >10% (Bachu, 2015). We use a central value of 5%, based on data from the Sleipner injection site (in 2013) (Thibeau et al, 2018). The Sleipner site does not have a distinct closure at the top of the reservoir and the full aquifer thickness is used for storage.…”
Section: Structural Trapping Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The capacity of the Utsira formation offshore Norway (an extensive shallow marine sandstone of Miocene age), which hosts the Sleipner CO2 storage project, has been much studied in terms of future storage potential. CO2 storage capacity estimates for the Utsira Fm range between 1 and 60 Gt depending on assumptions made; (82), ranging from the exploitation of structural traps only (at the low end) to development concepts using multiple wells, residual trapping, and pressure management (at the high end). However, the investiable resource (i.e.…”
Section: Trap Capacity and Pressure Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 storage studies on the Utsira Fm. have generally focused on the storage capacity for either the full formation (Gasda et al., 2017; Halland et al., 2011; Thibeau & Mucha, 2011), for discrete structural traps (Chadwick et al., 2008) or both (Bøe et al., 2002; Holloway, 1996; Thibeau et al., 2018). These studies either assume complete seal integrity or inject CO 2 until the maximum sealing pressure capacity is reached (Gasda et al., 2017; Thibeau & Mucha, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%