Revisiting the whole systems approach: designing supply chains in a turbulent world

Abstract

PurposeThe systems approach is an exemplar of design science research (DSR), whereby specific designs yield generic knowledge. DSR is increasingly being adopted in logistics and operations management research, but many point to neglect of the human aspects of solutions developed. The authors argue that it is possible to look back at the history of the systems movement to seek precedent for ‘dealing’ with the social components, providing a methodologically pluralistic ‘research design’ framework. Thereby, systems approaches are foundational to providing a design-based ‘science’ to progressing the logistics and supply chain management field, dealing with contemporary topics such as resilience.Design/methodology/approachThe authors undertake a discursive assessment of relevant streams of engineering, social science and systems research, with a conceptual development of how the latter influences supply chain design approaches.FindingsBuilding on a phenomenological framework, the authors create a generic design science research design (DSRD) that enables researchers to choose and integrate the right tools and methods to address simple, complicated and complex problems, dealing with technological, process and social problems.Research limitations/implicationsThe DSRD provides a framework by which to exploit a range of methodological stances to problem solving, including quantitative modelling perspectives and ‘soft’ systems social science approaches. Four substantive gaps are identified for future research – establishing the root cause domain of the problem, how to deal with the hierarchy of systems within systems, establishing appropriate criteria for the solution design and how best to deal with chaotic and disordered systems.Originality/valueThe authors argue that the systems approaches offer methodological pluralism by which a generic DSRD may be applied to enhance supply chain design. The authors show the relevance of the DSRD to supply chain design problems including in reducing supply chain dynamics and enhance resilience. In doing so, the study points towards an integrated perspective and future research agenda for designing resilient supply chains.

Simplifying Complexity? On Quality Decision-Making and Nonconformance Outcomes of Megaprojects

“…Figure 1 provides examples for each domain in the context of projects and interpreted in an operations management setting [36]. There is also a fifth domain (Disorder), for when there is ambiguity from decision maker(s) as to which of the other four domains their operational context resides within.…”

“…adapted from [33] From its origins in knowledge management [32]- [33], the Cynefin framework has been extended to management leadership [34], and more recently exploited in various operations management contexts, including healthcare [37] procurement [60], performance alignment [38], project management [39], supply chain design [36], and construction management [40]. Naim, Gosling and Hewlett undertook a comprehensive risk analysis of the failures in an infrastructure project.…”

The System Dynamics of Engineer-to-Order Construction Projects: Past, Present, and Future

“…After preliminary research, we found those systems-based approaches are widely used in both fields, hence potentially providing a bridge for knowledge sharing between Project Management (PM) and Supply Chain Management (SCM). While we focus on the quantitative SD and CT techniques the models developed from empirical studies are often founded on qualitative systems approaches such as systems thinking and soft system methodology (Naim and Gosling 2022) but such methods are beyond the scope of this study.…”