2020
DOI: 10.1177/1942775120945356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revolutionary Perspectives for Leadership Preparation: A Case of a Networked Improvement Community

Abstract: This qualitative study describes and interprets how two educational leadership programs, participants in the UCEA (University Council for Educational Administration) Program Design Network Improvement Community, identified and responded to a problem of practice by focusing on the needs of each program regarding the recruitment, selection, admission, and retention of candidates from underrepresented groups. Through collaborative learning and research, the programs were able to guide the change processes of thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standards for quality improvement in an institution’s admission process are also influenced by student expectations, constantly evolving and changing over time. Higher education institutions should become proactive and get top students on board to recruit diversified students, which will bring more transformation to the quality management process of the educational institutes ( Thornton et al, 2022 ). Other suggested quality admission process indicators include course distribution, room and transcript process management, staff interaction, institutional policies, procedures and control, and collaboration with international institutions, which all combine to form innovative capacities that provide quality management standards ( Agung Nugroho et al, 2020 ; Prameswari et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standards for quality improvement in an institution’s admission process are also influenced by student expectations, constantly evolving and changing over time. Higher education institutions should become proactive and get top students on board to recruit diversified students, which will bring more transformation to the quality management process of the educational institutes ( Thornton et al, 2022 ). Other suggested quality admission process indicators include course distribution, room and transcript process management, staff interaction, institutional policies, procedures and control, and collaboration with international institutions, which all combine to form innovative capacities that provide quality management standards ( Agung Nugroho et al, 2020 ; Prameswari et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, a quality management system requires and includes employee engagement, encouragement, accountability, leadership qualities, and a student-centered approach. The diversity management of processes that technological innovations have transformed can also improve the quality management in the admission process in educational institutes ( Thornton et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, the admission process provided by higher education includes the distribution of actual space for courses, room management, transcripts, quality management, and leadership staff interaction, institution productivity, measurement and control, certification and credential distribution, payments of contractors, and the development of foreign collaborations with innovation capabilities ( Agung Nugroho et al, 2020 ; Prameswari et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assortment of indicators suggests that some PPPs throughout the country have taken actions to strengthen the clinical experience. Beyond policy-motivated program improvement, enhancement of the clinical experience by preparation programs has been spurred by program improvement networks (e.g., NICs), large-scale, externally-funded improvement projects (Cunningham et al, 2019; Fry et al, 2007; Thornton et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2018), and program-based continuous improvement efforts (Cosner et al, 2012; Cosner et al, 2015; Fusarelli et al, 2018). For example, program surveys collected from University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA) member institutions suggest that many of these programs self-report having features of higher quality clinical experiences (Anderson et al, 2018; Winn et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%