“…Other works have explored the behaviour of the backers, that is, the contributors of the crowdfunding campaigns (Agrawal et al, 2015; Burtch et al, 2013; Cholakova and Clarysse, 2015; Kuppuswamy and Bayus, 2015; Mollick and Nanda, 2016; Ordanini et al, 2011). Although evidence exists that local characteristics affect entrepreneurs’ ability to attract external financing (Guiso et al, 2004a, 2004b), only few studies in the crowdfunding literature have explored the role of geography in the crowdfunding of early-stage entrepreneurial projects, showing that geographical proximity between proponents and backers helps attract contributions as it reduces information asymmetries between the two parties (Agrawal et al, 2015; Chan et al, 2018; Mollick, 2014; Mollick and Robb, 2016). However, despite the previous works have certainly enhanced our understanding of the crowdfunding phenomenon, less attention has been paid to the intriguing relationship between the success of the crowdfunding campaign and the founder’s location within a geographical cluster, where geographical clusters can be defined as geographical agglomerations of firms in particular, related, and/or complementary, activities, sharing a common vision, and exhibiting horizontal, vertical intra- and/or inter-sectoral linkages, embedded in a supportive socio-institutional setting, and cooperating and competing in national and international markets (Pitelis, 2012).…”