2018
DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2018.1480267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reward-based crowdfunding success: decomposition of the project, product category, entrepreneur, and location effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For future studies, we highlight the possibility of investigating the impact of the (recent) CVM legislation over the ECF market, e.g., models of the natural experiment type and DID (difference-in-differences) models, or even other success metrics (Chan, Park, Patel, & Gomulya, 2018). Finally, it warrants mentioning that the literature on startup financing via ECF in Brazil is still scarce (Felipe et al, 2019), revealing the relevance of this study and its role as a way of incentivizing the production of research on the topic addressed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future studies, we highlight the possibility of investigating the impact of the (recent) CVM legislation over the ECF market, e.g., models of the natural experiment type and DID (difference-in-differences) models, or even other success metrics (Chan, Park, Patel, & Gomulya, 2018). Finally, it warrants mentioning that the literature on startup financing via ECF in Brazil is still scarce (Felipe et al, 2019), revealing the relevance of this study and its role as a way of incentivizing the production of research on the topic addressed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emerging literature on reward-based crowdfunding mainly focus on two aspects, one is the static factors driving a campaign's success. Such factors include both project-level signals, for instance project funding goal [1], project design [2], product categories [3] and other project preparedness [4,5] and individual-level signals, such as creator's gender [6], experience of creator [7] and social capital of creator [8]. The other one is the influence of backers' decision behavior on dynamic information factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works have explored the behaviour of the backers, that is, the contributors of the crowdfunding campaigns (Agrawal et al, 2015; Burtch et al, 2013; Cholakova and Clarysse, 2015; Kuppuswamy and Bayus, 2015; Mollick and Nanda, 2016; Ordanini et al, 2011). Although evidence exists that local characteristics affect entrepreneurs’ ability to attract external financing (Guiso et al, 2004a, 2004b), only few studies in the crowdfunding literature have explored the role of geography in the crowdfunding of early-stage entrepreneurial projects, showing that geographical proximity between proponents and backers helps attract contributions as it reduces information asymmetries between the two parties (Agrawal et al, 2015; Chan et al, 2018; Mollick, 2014; Mollick and Robb, 2016). However, despite the previous works have certainly enhanced our understanding of the crowdfunding phenomenon, less attention has been paid to the intriguing relationship between the success of the crowdfunding campaign and the founder’s location within a geographical cluster, where geographical clusters can be defined as geographical agglomerations of firms in particular, related, and/or complementary, activities, sharing a common vision, and exhibiting horizontal, vertical intra- and/or inter-sectoral linkages, embedded in a supportive socio-institutional setting, and cooperating and competing in national and international markets (Pitelis, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%