2013
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reward sensitivity to faces versus objects in children: an ERP study

Abstract: How children respond to social and nonsocial rewards has important implications for understanding social cognitive development. Adults find faces intrinsically rewarding. However, little is known about how children respond to face vs nonface rewards. We utilized event-related potentials (the stimulus-preceding negativity, SPN) to measure differences in reward anticipation during a guessing game in 6- to 8-year-olds. Children were presented with reward indicators accompanied by incidental face or nonface stimul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
46
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though difficult to test empirically, several studies to date have used images of faces as signifiers of social reward (e.g., Delmonte et al, 2012; Kohls et al, 2011; Scott-Van Zeeland, Dapretto, Ghahremani, Poldrack, & Bookheimer, 2010). Neural response (and thus reward value) for faces appears to be diminished for children with ASD relative to their peers (Delmonte et al, 2012; Scott-Van Zeeland et al, 2010; Stavropoulos & Carver, 2014). However, findings are not entirely consistent, as documented by an alternative approach comparing level of effort (rate of key presses) exhibited to view images of faces versus non-face objects (Ewing, Pellicano, & Rhodes, 2013).…”
Section: Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though difficult to test empirically, several studies to date have used images of faces as signifiers of social reward (e.g., Delmonte et al, 2012; Kohls et al, 2011; Scott-Van Zeeland, Dapretto, Ghahremani, Poldrack, & Bookheimer, 2010). Neural response (and thus reward value) for faces appears to be diminished for children with ASD relative to their peers (Delmonte et al, 2012; Scott-Van Zeeland et al, 2010; Stavropoulos & Carver, 2014). However, findings are not entirely consistent, as documented by an alternative approach comparing level of effort (rate of key presses) exhibited to view images of faces versus non-face objects (Ewing, Pellicano, & Rhodes, 2013).…”
Section: Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, both younger children (around 24 months) [10] and older children (between 9 and 17 years) [11] show greater difficulty disengaging attention away from social compared to nonsocial stimuli. Brain-based measures such as event-related potentials (EPRs) reveal that children aged 6–8 years old have larger EPRs, reflecting greater sensitivity, to social reward compared to nonsocial reward [12]. …”
Section: Social Preference: the Way Humans Process Social Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, work with children and adults shows that mu rhythm desynchronization is greater when an observed act occurs in the context of joint action with another person [112,113]. The neural correlates of such 'social attention' deserve further investigation, particularly given the new developmental neuroscience work on social interaction, attention and reward in typically developing children [114,115] and children with autism [116,117].…”
Section: (B) Attentional Processes and Sensorimotor Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%