“…On the one hand, we see advocacy and research policy efforts 219 repeatedly trying to reform the current system, which is dominated by publisher prestige, to, instead, reward scholars for all activities and content types involved in research processes, not only for publications in the traditional, print legacy sense. These attempts have given rise to initiatives such as the Open Science Career Assessment Matrix (OS-CAM 220 , but, as pointed out by (Schöpfel and Azeroual 2021), such attempts do not cover the detailed and domain-specific guidance which could make them truly operational -for instance, exactly which people and which data-sharing behaviours should be rewarded (academics in the strict sense, or including research support personnel) -nor do they address anomalies such as the potential distortion of research interests in easily accessible and shareable data sources (Edmond 2015) as an entailment of data sharing mandates. Yet, the biggest problem is that although we see investment in data management and sharing increasingly become a condition of external research grant funding, they largely remain invisible when it comes to academic institutional hiring, tenure, and promotion criteria.…”