2009
DOI: 10.1177/0886368709337924
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewards and Performance of Swedish Real Estate Firms

Abstract: Empirical research indicates that real estate firms that adopt elements of a total rewards strategy perform better than firms that do not. COMPENSATION R e w a r d s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconnecting to the previous research of incentives in the Swedish real estate industry we can conclude that we as Azasu (2011 and2009) state are left with incomplete contracts. But Azasu furthermore conclude that this imply measurable incentive schemes, something that is not found in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reconnecting to the previous research of incentives in the Swedish real estate industry we can conclude that we as Azasu (2011 and2009) state are left with incomplete contracts. But Azasu furthermore conclude that this imply measurable incentive schemes, something that is not found in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theses incentives can be designed to be individual or on team/group basis (Lee et al 2015). But as Azasu (2011 and2009) states, the real estate manager's work is multidimensional, and it consists of tasks that are both measurable as well as non-measurable, but the later ones are still as important. This leaves us with either an incomplete contract or an incentive scheme.…”
Section: Incentives In Real Estate Management Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equity theory says that reward or pay system is considered fair if they are perceived to be fair (Jaques, 1961). Azasu (2009) suggested the "Principal-agency theory" in which mostly people are opportunist and always motivated through monetary rewards, while socioeconomic theorist argue that people are neither inclined toward monetary reward nor they have homogeneous approach, they might be fascinated by the cocktail of monetary and non monetary rewards that can be the potent to enhance their motivation and commitment (Malhotra et al, 2007). Vandenberghe et al (2008) links the big five personality attributes (extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, stability and openness to experience to performance of employee.…”
Section: Rewards In Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is still divided when it comes to its effect on individuals" creativity [ 9 ]. Azasu (2009) in his "Principal -agency" theory suggested that "most people are opportunist and are always motivated through monetary rewards, while the socio-economic theorist argue that people are neither inclined towards monetary rewards nor they do have a homogeneous approach but might be fascinated by the cocktail of monetary and non-monetary rewards that have the potential to enhance their motivation and commitment" [ 10 ].…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%