2011
DOI: 10.1057/pt.2011.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reweighting the General Household Survey 1979–2007

Abstract: We have calculated two new sets of weights applicable to the General Household Survey (GHS) from 1979 to 2007. One of these is for use with any general analysis of GHS topics and the second is designed for analyses of data collected in the Family Information section. The methods used follow closely those employed by ONS from 1996 onwards. The performance of the weights is assessed in estimating the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) from 1971-2007, an aggregate measure of fertility for which reliable figures are avail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, they may not know whether they will have a suitable partner who also wants children, or whether childcare will be available. The significance of uncertainty in fertility intentions has not received the attention it should (although see Berrington 2004;Ní Bhrolcháin et al 2010;Ní Bhrolcháin and Beaujouan 2011). Evidence from the 1970 cohort suggests that those who are uncertain have an intermediate chance of having a first birth: i.e., in between those who have a negative intention and those who have a positive intention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they may not know whether they will have a suitable partner who also wants children, or whether childcare will be available. The significance of uncertainty in fertility intentions has not received the attention it should (although see Berrington 2004;Ní Bhrolcháin et al 2010;Ní Bhrolcháin and Beaujouan 2011). Evidence from the 1970 cohort suggests that those who are uncertain have an intermediate chance of having a first birth: i.e., in between those who have a negative intention and those who have a positive intention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following analyses are based on revised fertility histories from 31,583 women where retrospectively reported births are augmented with additional information on children living in the household. The data are weighted to take account of survey design and non-response (Beaujouan, Brown, and Ni Bhrolchaín 2011).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have, accordingly, computed new weights on a consistent basis for the entire series of GHS rounds of 1979 to 2007, designed to adjust for non-response and to calibrate to population distributions by age, sex and region. The methods used are detailed in Beaujouan et al (2011) and can be briefly described as follows. A set of household weights, applicable to all individuals in each household was generated, first by applying ONS household nonresponse factors and then using Calmar to calibrate to population totals by age and sex, and by a regional classification similar to that of ONS (Sautory 1993;Barton 2001;Ali et al 2008: Appendix D).…”
Section: Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%