Reworking the Social Determinants of Health: Responding to Material‐Semiotic Indeterminacy in Public Health Interventions

Abstract

Both public health experts and medical anthropologists are concerned with how health is shaped by environmental forces. This creates an important cross‐disciplinary alliance, yet crucial differences in how the two disciplines tend to evaluate health remain. In this article, I compare public health's “social determinants of health” framework with anthropological interest in the sociality of health and illness. I draw on ethnographic fieldwork in Guatemala's highlands, to unpack (1) “the social,” (2) “determinants,” and (3) “of health.” Ultimately, I show how the social determinants framework is deployed in ways that risk undermining its stated health justice goals, and highlight the benefits of an approach that does not know what health is ahead of doing research and which works closely with communities to respond to the effects of its own intervention. The article argues for the need to rework the emphasis on social determinants to make space for health's material‐semiotic indeterminacy

‘Population self-reliance in health’ and COVID-19: The need for a 4th tier in the health system

“…The preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organisation (WHO) states that ‘Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’ but despite this broad definition, health systems continue to be orientated towards disease and the control of disease rather than on the broader dimension of the definition. This definition and a better knowledge of what the word ‘health’ means, continues to be discussed ( 36 ). A meeting in the Netherlands in 2011 created a definition of health that says it is: “the ability to adapt and self-manage in the face of environmental, social, physical, and emotional challenges” ( 37 , 38 ).…”

Like a Grinding Stone: How Crowdfunding Platforms Create, Perpetuate, and Value Health Inequities

“…The factors contributing to this opacity-including corporate interests, power hierarchies, and exclusion of diverse voices-also contribute to the dismissal of narratives as evidence of structural injustices (Benjamin 2019;Daniels 2013). And yet these narratives remain some of our most powerful records of how inequity is both produced and experienced (Das 2015;Sangaramoorthy 2019;Yates-Doerr 2020).…”

The changing climates of global health

“…Despite 40 years of appeals to pay attention to ‘structural determinants’, the social determinants of health remain a sanitised framework that risks overlooking health justice as a key component of achieving health for all. 51 …”