2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45483-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewriting the History of Number from Papua New Guinea and Oceania Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can find literally hundreds of different counting systems, using different symbols or no symbols, objects and materials varying with the cycles, or bases, used to deal with large numbers. Even in single countries like Papua New Guinea, a land of four million people but 800+ languages, there is a myriad of counting systems (Owens et al 2018). The symbolic and religious properties of geometric figures are of more interest in some societies than others, as are the predictive powers of certain numerological practices, myths and ideologies around their symbolic importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can find literally hundreds of different counting systems, using different symbols or no symbols, objects and materials varying with the cycles, or bases, used to deal with large numbers. Even in single countries like Papua New Guinea, a land of four million people but 800+ languages, there is a myriad of counting systems (Owens et al 2018). The symbolic and religious properties of geometric figures are of more interest in some societies than others, as are the predictive powers of certain numerological practices, myths and ideologies around their symbolic importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attention to differences in whole number approaches is increasing. It is worthwhile to mention at least the book by Owens (2015), with a chapter on visuospatial reasoning with numbers, and the book by Owens et al (2017) on the history of number in Papua New Guinea and Oceania that details number systems other than base 10 systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbally these systems can be compared with modulus systems, although they may function like base counting systems when totals are able to be carried, either mentally or with additional bodies (Wolfers, 1971). An abundance of multibase systems have also been studied in Papua New Guinea and Oceania (Owens, 2001;Owens & Lean, 2018), for instance the common 2-5-20 cycle, where counting proceeds: 1, 2, 2 + 1, 2 + 2, 5 (often one "hand"), 5 + 1, 5 + 2, 5 + 2 + 1, 5 + 2 + 2, 5 + 5, and so on, up to a new base of 20 (often one "man"). Even systems of finger counting show a great deal of diversity (Bender & Beller, 2012), as do numerical notation systems (Chrisomalis, 2009b).…”
Section: Forms Of Number Representation Are Diverse Across Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural history of mathematics shows that, large, exact, symbolic number is cognitively difficult for humans to create, the product of a long cross-cultural history (Chrisomalis, 2009b;Damerow, 2015;Ifrah, 2000;Joseph, 1987) and that modern conceptions of number are far from universal across human groups. The picture that emerges instead from the ethnographic literature reveals a diversity of culturally contingent approaches to problems of quantity, which are constructed according to local needs, perceptions, practices, and history (Beller et al, 2018;Crossley, 2007;Dixon & Kroeber, 1907;Hymes, 1955;Owens & Lean, 2018;Robson, 2008;Wolfers, 1971). We consider each of (i)-(vi) in turn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%