1989
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198903)45:2<277::aid-jclp2270450216>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rey-Auditory Verbal Learning and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Design performance in Alzheimer's disease and closed head injury

Abstract: Performance on the Rey‐Auditory Verbal Learning (R‐AVL) and Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Design (R‐O CFD) tests was examined in patients (N = 94) with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) and closed head injury (CHI). On the R‐AVL, DAT patients demonstrated considerably greater impairment than CHI patients, along with a flat learning/retention curve that showed negligible improvement with repeated trials, recency effects only, and an excessive number of word intrusions (confabulation) on the recognition tri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Measures designed to assess memory or neuropsychological functioning can serve a dual role in the assessment process because of their ability to assess a patient's cognitive functioning as well as his or her level of effort or response style (Gfeller & Cradock, 1998;Greve, Bianchini, Mathias, Houston, & Crouch, 2003;Langeluddecke & Lucas, 2003;Mittenberg, Azrin, Millsaps, & Heilbronner, 1993). Numerous investigators have explored the utility of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; Rey, 1964) for identifying suboptimal effort (e.g., Bernard, 1991;Bernard, Houston, & Natoli, 1993;Binder, Villaneuva, Howieson, & Moore, 1993;King, Gfeller, & Davis, 1998;Suhr, 2002;Sullivan, Deffenti, & Keane, 2002). For example, King et al (1998) investigated the validity of several markers of malingering based on component scores on the RAVLT, e.g., the total number of words recalled after a delay and the total number of intrusion errors during recognition testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures designed to assess memory or neuropsychological functioning can serve a dual role in the assessment process because of their ability to assess a patient's cognitive functioning as well as his or her level of effort or response style (Gfeller & Cradock, 1998;Greve, Bianchini, Mathias, Houston, & Crouch, 2003;Langeluddecke & Lucas, 2003;Mittenberg, Azrin, Millsaps, & Heilbronner, 1993). Numerous investigators have explored the utility of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; Rey, 1964) for identifying suboptimal effort (e.g., Bernard, 1991;Bernard, Houston, & Natoli, 1993;Binder, Villaneuva, Howieson, & Moore, 1993;King, Gfeller, & Davis, 1998;Suhr, 2002;Sullivan, Deffenti, & Keane, 2002). For example, King et al (1998) investigated the validity of several markers of malingering based on component scores on the RAVLT, e.g., the total number of words recalled after a delay and the total number of intrusion errors during recognition testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visuo-spatial and construction skills may be compromised by brain injury and TBI patients often have difficulty understanding the spatial relationship between component parts or suffer a spatial neglect (Bigler, Rosa, Schultz, Hall, & Harris, 1989). Motor, memory and executive components are intermixed in construction tasks as, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test, making it difficult to differentiate the primary deficit(s).…”
Section: General Description Reliability Data Validity Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, different degenerative diseases lead to different outcome patterns on the RAVLT. For example, patients with early Alzheimer dementia recall only a few words in trial one and slightly increase word recall over the other acquisition trials (Bigler, Rosa, Schultz, Hall, & Harris, 1989). They also show poor performance after a delay that includes distraction (Ferman et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%