34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-3260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reynolds Number Effect of Leading Edge Tubercles on Airfoil Aerodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These sinusoidal protrusions at the leading edge are favorable only in the post stall regime, for conventional NACA 4-digit airfoils [18]. The improvements in post stall aerodynamic characteristics and stalling angle progress more with increasing Reynolds number in the range 75000-300000 [19]. In spite of that there is a necessity to explore about the pioneering passive flow control devices that can markedly enrich the performance of the Wind turbines and MAVs.…”
Section: Fig1: Flight Speed Versus Chord Reynolds Number [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sinusoidal protrusions at the leading edge are favorable only in the post stall regime, for conventional NACA 4-digit airfoils [18]. The improvements in post stall aerodynamic characteristics and stalling angle progress more with increasing Reynolds number in the range 75000-300000 [19]. In spite of that there is a necessity to explore about the pioneering passive flow control devices that can markedly enrich the performance of the Wind turbines and MAVs.…”
Section: Fig1: Flight Speed Versus Chord Reynolds Number [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger gap between the tubercles leads to a drop in aerodynamic efficiency of the airfoils (Serson and Meneghini, 2015). The enhancements in post-stall aerodynamic characteristics and increase in stalling angle strengthens further with increasing Reynolds number in the range 75,000-300,000 (Peristy et al, 2016). In addition, these protrusions perform better on thicker airfoils as compared to thinner ones (Paula et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%