2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reynolds Number Effect on the Optimization of a Wind Turbine Blade for Maximum Aerodynamic Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al [9] showed that the power coefficient of a wind turbine is very sensitive to the change in the model scale, but the thrust coefficient is not. Ge et al [10] selected six airfoils and found they all exhibited better performance at a higher Reynolds number. Li et al [11] studied the Reynolds number effect on four thick airfoils at two different wind tunnels and found that increasing Re makes the separation point move towards the leading edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al [9] showed that the power coefficient of a wind turbine is very sensitive to the change in the model scale, but the thrust coefficient is not. Ge et al [10] selected six airfoils and found they all exhibited better performance at a higher Reynolds number. Li et al [11] studied the Reynolds number effect on four thick airfoils at two different wind tunnels and found that increasing Re makes the separation point move towards the leading edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the operational conditions of multi-MW wind turbine airfoils found in the inboard region of the blade [4,107], Re = 6 × 10 6 and M a = 0.1 was used in XFOIL. Furthermore, an N-crit number of 9, representing typical wind tunnel turbulence values, was used for all simulations.…”
Section: Design and Optimization Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forces recorded by the force sensor were divided by the dynamic pressure multiplied by the airfoil area to obtain the non-dimensional coefficients. The drag force multiplied by 2, as calculated by the wake momentum method, was divided by the velocity squared multiplied by the chord (see Equation 4.3) since it was only measured in a plane. The uncertainty in the wake method must account for the fact that the integration in Equation 4.3 is performed by summing the velocity and geometric measurements therefore the associated uncertainty is the combination of the 10 (typically) measurements within the wake.…”
Section: Lift and Drag Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations