1992
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1062406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rezeptorszintigraphie bei endokrinen gastroenteropankreatischen Tumoren*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Pauwels et al [48] described the localization of 23 out of 26 gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumours and Van Dongen et al [49] reported positive scans in four of four patients with carcinoids, one of one with MTC and one of one with an unclassified APUDoma using this technique. Ivancevic et al [50] reported a sensitivity of 67%-83% in GEP tumours and carcinoids, while Joseph et al [51], in a study of 38 patients, reported positive scans in 10 of 11 patients with gastrinomas, 10 of 11 patients with carcinoids, one of two patients with insulinomas and 10 of 14 patients with unclassified neuroendocrine tumours. The last two authors both mention the localization of tumour sites undetected with other imaging techniques.…”
Section: Comparison With Results Of Other Investigatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Pauwels et al [48] described the localization of 23 out of 26 gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumours and Van Dongen et al [49] reported positive scans in four of four patients with carcinoids, one of one with MTC and one of one with an unclassified APUDoma using this technique. Ivancevic et al [50] reported a sensitivity of 67%-83% in GEP tumours and carcinoids, while Joseph et al [51], in a study of 38 patients, reported positive scans in 10 of 11 patients with gastrinomas, 10 of 11 patients with carcinoids, one of two patients with insulinomas and 10 of 14 patients with unclassified neuroendocrine tumours. The last two authors both mention the localization of tumour sites undetected with other imaging techniques.…”
Section: Comparison With Results Of Other Investigatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) [11]. The failure to localize insulinomas in a substantial number of patients has also been reported by others [9,[12][13][14]19] and may be due to the absence of somatostatin receptors or the presence of a somatostatin receptor that does not bind octreotide [20]. From a cost-effectiveness analysis [4] we conclude that the highest yield in tumor detection against the lowest cost is obtained if CT scanning is applied first in all patients.…”
Section: Endocrine Pancreatic Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Previously unrecognized sites were found in 5 of 12 patients (42 %). Others reported comparable results [12][13][14][15][16]. Endoscopic US has been reported to have a high detection rate for gastrinomas [17].…”
Section: Endocrine Pancreatic Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Sie sind daher in der Regel klein, d. h. kleiner als 1,5 cm. Eine ä hnlich hohe Sensitivitä t hat offensichtlich auch die Somatostatinrezeptorszintigraphie bei allen endokrin aktiven Tumoren mit Ausnahme des Insulinoms [16,46]. Die Primä rdiagnostik stü tzt sich daher zunä chst auf Hormonbestimmungen im Basalzustand oder nach spezifischer Stimulation.…”
Section: Neuroendokrine Tumore Des Pankreasunclassified