2019 Joint International EUROSOI Workshop and International Conference on Ultimate Integration on Silicon (EUROSOI-ULIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/eurosoi-ulis45800.2019.9041863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RF characterization and small signal extraction on 22 nm CMOS fully-depleted SOI technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As high fT is usually ass with lower device NF, we have biased several N-MOSFET to reach fT above ~340 G study their noise performance, as shown in Table 1. However, unlike the device's N is known to be less sensitive to the transistor's layout parasitics resistance and capac Similar to NFmin, fMAX is highly dependent on the layout of the transistor, and sinc 22FDX offers options to vary the contact poly pitch (CPP, see Figure 2), the effects on NFmin and fMAX were explored in pre-PEX simulation [14]. As shown in Table 1, t tors with pitches that are 208 nm (CPP2x) have higher fMAX than the narrower pitched (CPP1x) devices, and their differences become more significant as the total widt creased.…”
Section: Contact Poly Pitch (Cpp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As high fT is usually ass with lower device NF, we have biased several N-MOSFET to reach fT above ~340 G study their noise performance, as shown in Table 1. However, unlike the device's N is known to be less sensitive to the transistor's layout parasitics resistance and capac Similar to NFmin, fMAX is highly dependent on the layout of the transistor, and sinc 22FDX offers options to vary the contact poly pitch (CPP, see Figure 2), the effects on NFmin and fMAX were explored in pre-PEX simulation [14]. As shown in Table 1, t tors with pitches that are 208 nm (CPP2x) have higher fMAX than the narrower pitched (CPP1x) devices, and their differences become more significant as the total widt creased.…”
Section: Contact Poly Pitch (Cpp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, NF min at 28 GHz is consistently better for the CPP2x devices as they are lower than the CPP1x devices. This is because a wide pitch in CPP2x devices can fit more drain and source contacts, and due to the increased contact areas, the drain and source resistance is effectively reduced and, therefore, both NF min and f MAX are improved [14]. Consequently, a CPP of 208 nm is selected for all NMOS devices used in this design.…”
Section: Contact Poly Pitch (Cpp)mentioning
confidence: 99%