2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RF-Net: An End-To-End Image Matching Network Based on Receptive Field

Abstract: This paper proposes a new end-to-end trainable matching network based on receptive field, RF-Net, to compute sparse correspondence between images. Building end-toend trainable matching framework is desirable and challenging. The very recent approach, LF-Net, successfully embeds the entire feature extraction pipeline into a jointly trainable pipeline, and produces the state-of-the-art matching results. This paper introduces two modifications to the structure of LF-Net. First, we propose to construct receptive f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature matching networks (Yi et al, 2016, Ono et al, 2018, Christiansen et al, 2019, Shen et al, 2019, Kniaz et al, 2020 seems to outperform handcrafted feature detectors/descriptor methods. Still, their performance is closely related to the similarity of local image patches in the training dataset with respect to the images used during inference.…”
Section: Deep Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature matching networks (Yi et al, 2016, Ono et al, 2018, Christiansen et al, 2019, Shen et al, 2019, Kniaz et al, 2020 seems to outperform handcrafted feature detectors/descriptor methods. Still, their performance is closely related to the similarity of local image patches in the training dataset with respect to the images used during inference.…”
Section: Deep Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were performed using different remote sensing images to evaluate the performance and robustness of the algorithm. Seven remote sensing registration algorithms were used as comparison groups: SIFT [14], SURF [16], FSC-SIFT [20], PSO-SIFT [17], SAR-SIFT [19], PSO-SIFT-CNN [23] and RF-Net [31].…”
Section: F Experimental Setting and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth approach is based on deep network image matching (registration) not only can extract the deep features of key points, but also can automatically extract key points.Methods that apply this approach include D2-Net [29], Super-Point [30], and RF-Net models [31]. These methods are commonly used for natural image matching, and have good robustness to angle and illumination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the pulmonary lesion or multi-organ segmentation task, the edge detail of the smaller lesion/organ is not fine by the large receptor field and the structure of the lesion/organ is not obvious by the small receptor field. Therefore, it is very important to use the convolution kernel with different receptive fields to process the image (Luo et al, 2016 ; Peng et al, 2017 ; Shen et al, 2019 ). In the natural image processing task, satisfactory results are obtained by combining the convolution of different receptive fields (Seif and Androutsos, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%