2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rfam 13.0: shifting to a genome-centric resource for non-coding RNA families

Abstract: The Rfam database is a collection of RNA families in which each family is represented by a multiple sequence alignment, a consensus secondary structure, and a covariance model. In this paper we introduce Rfam release 13.0, which switches to a new genome-centric approach that annotates a non-redundant set of reference genomes with RNA families. We describe new web interface features including faceted text search and R-scape secondary structure visualizations. We discuss a new literature curation workflow and a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
720
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 872 publications
(729 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
720
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify small RNAs in these three pests, cleaned reads were annotated by Blastn against the nr database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), Rfam (Kalvari et al ., ) and RepBase (Jurka et al ., ), and then two algorithms were used to identify the miRNAs. One algorithm involved homology‐searching against arthropod miRNAs in the miRbase (Kozomara and Griffiths‐Jones, ) using a cut‐off of 0‐2 nt mismatches or deletions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify small RNAs in these three pests, cleaned reads were annotated by Blastn against the nr database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), Rfam (Kalvari et al ., ) and RepBase (Jurka et al ., ), and then two algorithms were used to identify the miRNAs. One algorithm involved homology‐searching against arthropod miRNAs in the miRbase (Kozomara and Griffiths‐Jones, ) using a cut‐off of 0‐2 nt mismatches or deletions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, noncoding RNA databases are also frequently used in finding noncoding RNA. Some such databases are RNAdb (Pang et al ., ), NONCODE (Zhao et al ., ), Rfam (Kalvari et al ., ), miRBase (Kozomara and Griffiths‐Jones, ) and snoRNABase (Xie et al ., ). Prediction of protein‐coding genes The identification of protein‐coding genes is the most important part of structural annotation. There are three approaches to predict protein‐coding genes from the genome: (1) identifying homologues of known protein‐coding genes through sequence similarity; (2) de novo predicting the protein‐coding genes with software developed via machine learning of protein‐coding gene structures; and (3) determining the exonic regions by direct transcriptome sequencing [eg RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) or expressed sequence tags (ESTs)] and aligning to the assembled scaffolds.…”
Section: Insect Genome Assembly and Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with release 13.0, Rfam provides ncRNA annotations of a non-redundant set of complete genomes (Kalvari et al, 2017). The text search enables viewing RNA families found in a certain species or taxonomic group, comparing RNAs found in different genomes, and viewing annotations of individual ncRNA sequences found in a genome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%