2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RFCRYS: Sequence-based protein crystallization propensity prediction by means of random forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SCMCRYS [22], as a simple voting method, was developed based on the P-collocated amino acid pairs. To further improve performance, some methods, including XtalPred [23], Pxs [15], SVMCRYS [24], PPCPred [13], XANNPred [25], RFCRYS [26] and CRYSpred [27], have incorporated other informative features, such as predicted secondary structure, disorder and solvent accessibility. More recently, Jahandideh et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCMCRYS [22], as a simple voting method, was developed based on the P-collocated amino acid pairs. To further improve performance, some methods, including XtalPred [23], Pxs [15], SVMCRYS [24], PPCPred [13], XANNPred [25], RFCRYS [26] and CRYSpred [27], have incorporated other informative features, such as predicted secondary structure, disorder and solvent accessibility. More recently, Jahandideh et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remedy this shortcoming of AAC, Chou (Chou 2001a, b;Shen and Chou 2008) proposed a PseAAC feature by incorporating protein sequential information into the traditional AAC feature. PseAAC has been widely used in protein attribute prediction problems (Huang et al 2009;Roy et al 2009;Jahandideh and Mahdavi 2012;Huang and Yuan 2013;Zou 2014) including AFP prediction (Kandaswamy et al 2011).…”
Section: Pseudo Amino Acid Composition Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the different design aims and benchmarks used, it is not easy to assess which method and features are the most effective. From the study in [14] and Table 1, we can see that the SVM_POLY method (see the work [13]) using SVM has the highest accuracy among the non-ensemble methods. This method is one of the four SVM predictors that are integrated into PPCpred [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many sequence-based computational methods, including OB-Score [6], SECRET [7], CRYSTALP [8], XtalPred [9], ParCrys [10], CRYSTALP2 [11], SVMCRYS [12], PPCpred [13] and RFCRYS [14], predict protein crystallization, as shown in Table 1. Both support vector machine (SVM) [7], [12], [13] and the ensemble mechanism [13], [14] are well-known techniques to enhance prediction accuracy. Because of the different design aims and benchmarks used, it is not easy to assess which method and features are the most effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation