2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RFDCR: Automated brain lesion segmentation using cascaded random forests with dense conditional random fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major drawback of convolutional neural network models (CNN) lies in the fuzzy segmentation outcomes and the spatial information reduction caused by the strides of convolutions and pooling operations 32 . To further improve the segmentation accuracy and efficiency, several advanced strategies have been applied to obtain better segmentation results 21 , 25 , 33 , 34 with approaches like dilated convolution/pooling 35 37 , skip connections 38 , 39 , as well as additional analysis and new post-processing modules like Conditional Random Field (CRF) and Hidden Conditional Random Field (HCRF) 10 , 40 , 41 . Using the dilated convolution method causes a large receptive field to be used without applying the pooling layer to the aim of relieving the issue of information loss during the training phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major drawback of convolutional neural network models (CNN) lies in the fuzzy segmentation outcomes and the spatial information reduction caused by the strides of convolutions and pooling operations 32 . To further improve the segmentation accuracy and efficiency, several advanced strategies have been applied to obtain better segmentation results 21 , 25 , 33 , 34 with approaches like dilated convolution/pooling 35 37 , skip connections 38 , 39 , as well as additional analysis and new post-processing modules like Conditional Random Field (CRF) and Hidden Conditional Random Field (HCRF) 10 , 40 , 41 . Using the dilated convolution method causes a large receptive field to be used without applying the pooling layer to the aim of relieving the issue of information loss during the training phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an initial step in this kind of segmentation, the key information is extracted from the input image using some feature extraction algorithm, and then a discriminative model is trained to recognize the tumor from normal tissues. The designed machine learning techniques generally employ hand-crafted features with various classifiers, such as random forest 10 , support vector machine (SVM) 11 , 12 , fuzzy clustering 3 . The designed methods and features extraction algorithms have to extract features, edge-related details, and other necessary information—which is time-consuming 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision trees are a class of widely used machine learning algorithms, which achieve state-of-the-art performance in many tasks including in lesion and tissue segmentation. [22][23][24][25][26][27] The first GBDT was a LightGBM regressor (C1 reg ) trained on features of the brain on a per parcellated brain region basis, whereas the second GBDT was a LightGBM classifier (C2 vox ) trained on voxelwise brain features in standard Montreal Neurological Institute 152 (MNI152) space. The workflow is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a computational method of lesion detection, comprising two stacked gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) LightGBM (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) 21 classifiers/regressors. Decision trees are a class of widely used machine learning algorithms, which achieve state‐of‐the‐art performance in many tasks including in lesion and tissue segmentation 22‐27 . The first GBDT was a LightGBM regressor (C1 reg ) trained on features of the brain on a per parcellated brain region basis, whereas the second GBDT was a LightGBM classifier (C2 vox ) trained on voxelwise brain features in standard Montreal Neurological Institute 152 (MNI152) space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation