2013
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2013.973.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RFLP Identification of Colletotrichum Species Isolated From Chilli in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, RFLP or virtual RFLP techniques are considered to be essential tools to solve the problems of species differentiation in microorganisms, such as the identification of 3 species of Colletotrichum causing chili anthracnose in Thailand, pineapple spoilage fungi, and three major Meloidogyne species in Korea, as well as the classification of phytoplasma using cpn60 universal target sequences (Han et al 2004;Koffi et al 2019;Pérez-López et al 2016;Pongpisutta et al 2013) Apart from this, In silico testing has reported that this method can be solve the error of PCR-RFLP method, caused by primers that may not amplify PCR products and low PCR product concentration that affect availability of template for cleavage by restriction enzymes and affect visibility of digested product on agarose gels, including PCR master mixed such as MgCl2, Taq buffer contained with KCl or (NH4)2SO4 and primer dimers that can inhibit activity of restriction enzyme (Ramdeen and Rampersad 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, RFLP or virtual RFLP techniques are considered to be essential tools to solve the problems of species differentiation in microorganisms, such as the identification of 3 species of Colletotrichum causing chili anthracnose in Thailand, pineapple spoilage fungi, and three major Meloidogyne species in Korea, as well as the classification of phytoplasma using cpn60 universal target sequences (Han et al 2004;Koffi et al 2019;Pérez-López et al 2016;Pongpisutta et al 2013) Apart from this, In silico testing has reported that this method can be solve the error of PCR-RFLP method, caused by primers that may not amplify PCR products and low PCR product concentration that affect availability of template for cleavage by restriction enzymes and affect visibility of digested product on agarose gels, including PCR master mixed such as MgCl2, Taq buffer contained with KCl or (NH4)2SO4 and primer dimers that can inhibit activity of restriction enzyme (Ramdeen and Rampersad 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA of each isolate was extracted using the method of Pongpisutta et al (2013) and the modified protocol of Zimand et al (1994). PCR amplification was performed for the partial internal transcribed spacer (ITS region), actin gene (ACT), chitin synthase 1 gene (CHS-1) and β-tubulin (TUB) regions, as well as with specific primers for C. acutatum and C. gloeosporioides (Table 1).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Fungal Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%