2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhamnus alaternus growth under four simulated shade environments: Morphological, anatomical and physiological responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Under 95% shade, the shoot:root ratio was 0.97, two times higher than the 0 or 50% shade treatments. In Rhamnus alaternus, a decrease in light induces an increasing shoot:root ratio, and this phenomenon was explained by a reduction in evaporative demand due to shading, affecting the water absorption needs, which possibly diminished the root growth (Miralles et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under 95% shade, the shoot:root ratio was 0.97, two times higher than the 0 or 50% shade treatments. In Rhamnus alaternus, a decrease in light induces an increasing shoot:root ratio, and this phenomenon was explained by a reduction in evaporative demand due to shading, affecting the water absorption needs, which possibly diminished the root growth (Miralles et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shoot/root dry weight ratio ranged from 0.48 to 1.05 and from 0.56 to 1.29 in the 'Blanc Rouge' and 'Mantefon' plants, respectively (Table 1), with lower ratios in the plants treated with 160 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 light. In a study by Miralles et al (2011), a decrease in light intensity by shading increased the shoot / root ratio of Rhamnus alternus. A phenomenon that could be explained by a reduction in evaporative demand under shaded conditions, affecting the water absorption needs, thereby possibly reducing the root growth (Rhie et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The sun trapping leaves have a higher number of photosynthetic apparatus components providing the photosynthetic capability per unit of leaf area. The capacity of plants to adapt to shading was confirmed by (Miralles et al, 2011). Reed et al (2012) have indicated that the entire photosynthetic apparatus in shade is more efficient at harvesting light, but it assimilates less CO 2 in comparison with the leaves in the sun.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%