1973
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90094-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheologic hysteresis curve shape specificity of mixed lipid films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it cannot be ruled out that rearrangements within the monolayer may also have an effect. Sphingomyelins have previously been reported to form metastable monolayers. , In agreement with the present study, it was shown, from constant area−Π measurements, that monolayers of sphingomyelins were stable up to 20 mN/m . To give further information concerning the instability of the sphingomyelin monolayer, additional experiments were performed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, it cannot be ruled out that rearrangements within the monolayer may also have an effect. Sphingomyelins have previously been reported to form metastable monolayers. , In agreement with the present study, it was shown, from constant area−Π measurements, that monolayers of sphingomyelins were stable up to 20 mN/m . To give further information concerning the instability of the sphingomyelin monolayer, additional experiments were performed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3a ). The hysteresis shown in the isotherms is common for membrane lipids and surface‐active proteins [11,14,15]; in the case of glycogenin it amounts to a rather high compression free energy gap of 27.3 kcal/mol. This indicates that the protein intermolecular organization at the surface is capable, over the long range, of conserving information of the molecular state acquired initially under spreading, and after it has reached the compressed packing state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hysteresis, corresponding to a free energy gap of 16 kcal/mol between compression and decompression calculated using isotherms similar to those shown in Fig. 3A, is larger than that of c-Fos and other membrane proteins [13,[26][27][28]. This can be due to the fact that c-Jun has a significantly more expanded character than c-Fos at the interface.…”
Section: C-jun Is Amphitropic and Interacts With Phospholipidsmentioning
confidence: 84%