2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4949695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological and thermal performance of newly developed binder systems for ceramic injection molding

Abstract: Abstract. In a novel binder system, carnauba wax was considered to replace the synthetic backbone polymers (polyolefins) enhancing the environmental sustainability of Ceramic Injection Molding (CIM) technology. The paper presents comparison of the rheological performance and thermal behavior of the aluminum oxide CIM feedstocks based on a binder containing carnauba wax with those consisting of a commercial binder. Further, acrawax (N, N'-Ethylene Bis-stearamide) has been considered as another possible substitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wettability trend is as follow: EGMA-3 (66.9°) > E40-3 (73.3°) > C–O (94.3°). The low contact angle of the binder is critical to ensure sufficient wetting of the metallic powder, subsequently promoting appropriate mixing and moulding of metal powders [36].
Figure 5 Contact angle of the POM-based binder system with different compatibiliser compositions.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wettability trend is as follow: EGMA-3 (66.9°) > E40-3 (73.3°) > C–O (94.3°). The low contact angle of the binder is critical to ensure sufficient wetting of the metallic powder, subsequently promoting appropriate mixing and moulding of metal powders [36].
Figure 5 Contact angle of the POM-based binder system with different compatibiliser compositions.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that the variety of possible combinations of the dispersed filler and the polymer mixture of binders leads, both quantitatively and qualitatively, to a significant difference in the properties of feedstocks, which determine the technological modes of their processing and, to a large extent, the quality of the final product-parts mass-produced by the PIM method. Polyoxymethylene (POM), polyolefins in the form of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and other polymers and oligomers are the main components of binders [3][4][5]. However, the most industrially demanded types of polymer binders in PIM technology are polyoxymethylene-based compositions and wax-polyolefin mixtures [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyoxymethylene (POM), polyolefins in the form of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and other polymers and oligomers are the main components of binders [3][4][5]. However, the most industrially demanded types of polymer binders in PIM technology are polyoxymethylene-based compositions and wax-polyolefin mixtures [3][4][5]. Despite a large number of research and experimental and technological works devoted to different compositions of polymer binders for PIM technology, the actual task is still a comparative analysis of the properties of different binders to determine their advantages and disadvantages and to optimize the compositions used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Hausnerova [ 36 ] reviewed the different binder systems for PIM feedstocks. It is suggested that polypropylene (PP) provides higher mechanical properties than other backbone polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%