2018
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2018.1519192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological evaluation of bitumen modified using antistripping additives synthesised from waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned before, as PET is a thermoplastic material that stiffens the bitumen more than the rubber part, an increase of up to 50% PET and 50% CR in the PET/CR ratio increased the mixtures' resilient modulus, but higher PET percentages reduced it (also mentioned in [30][31][32][33][34][35]). Previous studies confirmed that the addition of PET/CR improved this modulus [31][32][33][34][35] and stated that an increase in CR in the PET/CR ratio declined the additive distribution in the bitumen matrix due to, maybe, the CR partial cross-linking and low thermoplastic PET swelling [54]. is might be due to the formation of a continuous elastic network and rubber powder as an elastic component compensates the undesirable (stiffening) effects of PET as the plastic constituent resulting in improved functional properties of binders at intermediate temperatures.…”
Section: Mr Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…As mentioned before, as PET is a thermoplastic material that stiffens the bitumen more than the rubber part, an increase of up to 50% PET and 50% CR in the PET/CR ratio increased the mixtures' resilient modulus, but higher PET percentages reduced it (also mentioned in [30][31][32][33][34][35]). Previous studies confirmed that the addition of PET/CR improved this modulus [31][32][33][34][35] and stated that an increase in CR in the PET/CR ratio declined the additive distribution in the bitumen matrix due to, maybe, the CR partial cross-linking and low thermoplastic PET swelling [54]. is might be due to the formation of a continuous elastic network and rubber powder as an elastic component compensates the undesirable (stiffening) effects of PET as the plastic constituent resulting in improved functional properties of binders at intermediate temperatures.…”
Section: Mr Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[105] Better performance in various measurements was found when the terminal groups were amines instead of hydroxyls in BHETA indicating that the identity of the terminal groups are important likely because of the more facile reactivity of amines. [106] A similar approach, except in this case using glycolysis via propylene glycol, was used as well. In this case, the reaction was complete in one case and only 50% complete in the other.…”
Section: Other Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section investigates the differences in the mechanical properties (e.g., fatigue damage, rutting deformation, and moisture sensitivity) of asphalt mixtures as a result of adding recycled PET waste. These properties are derived from the results of past investigations [38,45,49]. In previous studies, PET waste material was mostly applied to asphalt mixtures using the dry process [34] or used as a replacement to the fine aggregates in the mixture to enhance pavement resistance to permanent deformation [50].…”
Section: Pet Waste As Additive In Asphalt Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micronized PET had the least impact on moisture damage in asphalt mixtures, likely because the PET particles improved the mastic cohesion, via binder rheology, mechanical adhesion, and surface energy. On the other hand, Padhan et al [49] evaluated the stripping resistance of an asphalt mixture using amine-based additives. The results showed that BAET significantly improved the resistance of the asphalt mixtures against These findings agree with those of Ameri and Nasr [48], who showed that PET additive improved asphalt mixture resistance against moisture as seen in Figure 15, but the improvement decreased when a higher amount of PET was added, resulting in reduced asphalt binder workability.…”
Section: Ameri and Nasr (2017)mentioning
confidence: 99%