2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological properties and baking performance of new waxy lines: Strengths and weaknesses

Abstract: b Consiglio per la Ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Unità di ricerca per la selezione dei cereali e la valorizzazione delle varietà vegetali (CREA-ZA), S. Angelo Lodigiano, Italy c current address: Consiglio per la Ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'Economia Agraria,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the decrease in dough water absorption and mixing time could be due to the low molecular weight of the hydrolyzed gluten proteins . Another negative effect is the increase in dough weakening (Table ), usually related to dough stickiness . Even if, in this study, dough did not stick to hands or bowl during mixing and processing, evaluating the effects of sprouting on dough stickiness by an objective approach is worthy of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the decrease in dough water absorption and mixing time could be due to the low molecular weight of the hydrolyzed gluten proteins . Another negative effect is the increase in dough weakening (Table ), usually related to dough stickiness . Even if, in this study, dough did not stick to hands or bowl during mixing and processing, evaluating the effects of sprouting on dough stickiness by an objective approach is worthy of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…15 Another negative effect is the increase in dough weakening (Table 1), usually related to dough stickiness. 16 Even if, in this study, dough did not stick to hands or bowl during mixing and processing, evaluating the effects of sprouting on dough stickiness by an objective approach is worthy of interest. By setting up the processing conditionsincluding the amount of water and the mixing timeas suggested by the Farinograph® test (Table 1), it was also possible to prepare bread from 100% sprouted wheat, which showed high volume without collapsing after baking ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Three portions (5 g each) of the resulted doughs were molded in a spherical shape and then placed in three Petri dishes, and subjected to leavening at 30° C. The Petri dishes were scanned at 300 dpi with a flatbed scanner (Epson Perfection 550 Photo, Seiko-Epson, Suwa, Japan) at the beginning of the test, and after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min and 180 min. The radial increase of the dough area (mm2) was determined by image analysis using the Image Pro Plus software v. 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, USA) and it was used to determine the relative increase of dough surface (A_t/A_t0), through the ratio between the area at time t (A_t) and the area of the dough at the beginning of the test (A_t0), according to (Caramanico et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dough Preparation and Leavening Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dough stickiness may result in chewy bread that adheres to the mouth. Often the dough would seem unbaked, and would thus contribute to decreased consumer acceptance (Caramanico et al, 2018). Grausgruber et al (2003) classified sticky and non-sticky dough as: stickiness greater than 90 g results in sticky dough, and less than 80 g produces non-sticky dough.…”
Section: Stickiness Of Leavened Doughmentioning
confidence: 99%