2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00397-005-0033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological properties of branched polystyrenes: linear viscoelastic behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while in the proximity of the glass transition temperature branches influence the thermorheological behavior only to a very slight degree (or not at all), because branching points have almost no effect on the free volume [67], for semicrystalline materials, such as PE, a significant influence of branches on the thermorheological behavior becomes obvious at least 100K above the glass transition temperature [68][69][70]. The activation energy of linear PE is found to be around 27-28 kJ/mol, while higher values are reported for linear mLLDPE, which scale with comonomer content and length (=short chain branch length) [34,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, while in the proximity of the glass transition temperature branches influence the thermorheological behavior only to a very slight degree (or not at all), because branching points have almost no effect on the free volume [67], for semicrystalline materials, such as PE, a significant influence of branches on the thermorheological behavior becomes obvious at least 100K above the glass transition temperature [68][69][70]. The activation energy of linear PE is found to be around 27-28 kJ/mol, while higher values are reported for linear mLLDPE, which scale with comonomer content and length (=short chain branch length) [34,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We can anticipate that MM‐1000, whose chain rigidity and T g are higher than those of the polyols and tackifier, will increase η* and G ′; however, G ′ behavior at low shear rate cannot be explained this way. When short‐chain branches, whose molecular weight is smaller than the critical molecular weight for intermolecular chain entanglement, are introduced into a polymer chain, reduction of G ′ is generally observed at low shear rates because the molecular cross‐sectional area is increased and the intermolecular chain entanglement of main chain is restricted by the presence of short‐chain branches 19–22. So, this reduced intermolecular chain entanglement in the presence of short‐chain branches, resulting from modification with MM‐1000, seems to be the main cause of G ′ reduction at low shear rates (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7a from ref. 48 Table 4 Rate coefficient data for the zero shear viscosity of the star polystyrene 3 and 4 obtained from fitting the experimental data in Fig. 6 via eqn (4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%