2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological Properties of Gels Formed at the Oil–Water Interface by the Reaction between Tetrameric Acid and Calcium Ion under Flow Conditions and at the Batch Scale

Abstract: The interfacial reaction between ARN tetrameric acid and Ca 2+ which leads to the formation of calcium naphthenate deposits was studied using a co-axial capillary device fitted to a profile analysis tensiometer. This device allows to continuously exchange the oil droplet subphase by a fresh ARN containing solution, thus mimicking the flow of oil as in an industrial separator.The effect of pH was first studied, and it was found there was a formation of a crosslinking structure by reaction between ARN and Ca 2+ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is particularly consistent with the interfacial shear 28−30 and dilational 27,31,32 rheology measurements performed on model systems, i.e., ARN (or its model compound named BP-10) dissolved in organic solvent in the presence of an aqueous phase containing Ca 2+ at basic pH. The proposed mechanism is far from being complete.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This mechanism is particularly consistent with the interfacial shear 28−30 and dilational 27,31,32 rheology measurements performed on model systems, i.e., ARN (or its model compound named BP-10) dissolved in organic solvent in the presence of an aqueous phase containing Ca 2+ at basic pH. The proposed mechanism is far from being complete.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, experimental conditions for bottle tests had to be adjusted, and consequently, there are significant differences between the two techniques. The most significant is the fact that the ARN concentration was increased 10-fold to 100 μM in bottle tests, a decision based on previous bottle test experiments, 27 to make the detection of the deposit easier. Another difference is the absence of shaking in experiments performed with the SINTERFACE apparatus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations