2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-008-9362-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhetorical gamesmanship in the nano debates over sunscreens and nanoparticles

Abstract: Communication of risk profiles associated with sunscreens incorporating nanoparticles has been challenging when some communicators shift risk profiles from highly problematic nanoparticles to others, which are much less problematic. This article vets a popular publication from a civic advocacy group that cited scientific research papers to make environmental health and safety claims. The phenomenon of risk profile shifts is demonstrated by re-examining the scientific articles being cited. In addition, the auth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in most instances, nanomanufacturing processes for CNTs remain little more than expanded laboratory experiments, the measurement techniques are still evolving, and reproducible manufacturing methods are, only now, beginning to appear. More importantly for the CNT and other allied nanoparticles, the potential toxicity is being debated [12,13] and has not been fully documented in the literature [14]. In addition, where CNT are concerned, the life-cycle fate of the nanoparticles is unknown for CNT-reinforced products, whereas CNCs can potentially degrade (under appropriate conditions) to carbon dioxide and water within 90 days [4].…”
Section: Metrology Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most instances, nanomanufacturing processes for CNTs remain little more than expanded laboratory experiments, the measurement techniques are still evolving, and reproducible manufacturing methods are, only now, beginning to appear. More importantly for the CNT and other allied nanoparticles, the potential toxicity is being debated [12,13] and has not been fully documented in the literature [14]. In addition, where CNT are concerned, the life-cycle fate of the nanoparticles is unknown for CNT-reinforced products, whereas CNCs can potentially degrade (under appropriate conditions) to carbon dioxide and water within 90 days [4].…”
Section: Metrology Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanomaterials have excessive potential to get access some cellular barriers to able reaching the cells and molecules in various diseases (Suri et al, 2007;Said et al, 2012). It is thought that zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) are bio-safe and biocompatible and could be applied in biomedical materials (Berube, 2008). Recent studies reported the ameliorative effect of ZnO-NPs on male reproductive functions (Afifi et al, 2015;Hafez, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For partially soluble NPs, such as nano ZnO, there was also the concern that that NPs may deliver a bolus dose of zinc ions upon dissolution in acidic biological matrices (Gerischer & Sorg 1992;Xia et al 2008). These concerns have led to some consumer groups, non-government organisations and parts of the scientific community to call for nanoproduct labelling requirements, and even exclusion of NP-containing products until their safety can be unequivocally proven (Berube 2008;Wright 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%