dorsal midline structures. They are classified as open if the neural tissue is exposed at the skin surface; closed if there is a cutaneous covering. Open spinal dysraphisms include meningoceles and myelomeningoceles, which consist of external protrusions of the meninges alone or both the meninges and the spinal cord, and typically present as translucent midline lesions. 1,2 Closed (occult) spinal dysraphisms are more subtle with overlying, often normal-appearing skin concealing the defect. In up to 76% of cases, however, occult spinal dysraphisms are accompanied by 1 or more paraspinal cutaneous lesions that serve as markers for the underlying malformations. 3 Common manifestations include lipomas, acrochordons, true tails, pseudotails, dimples, dermoid cysts or sinuses, localized hypertrichosis, and vascular abnormalities. These associated lesions most frequently arise in the lumbosacral region but also rarely occur at the cervical or thoracic levels. 4 The concurrence of skin and spinal defects is likely owing to their shared embryologic origin whereby the ectoderm gives rise to both the epithelial and neural ectoderm. 1,2,5 With suspicion for spinal dysraphism, radiologic images should be obtained to rule out neural tissue involvement prior to performing skin biopsies. Magnetic resonance imaging is the first-line choice of diagnostic imaging, but for those with contraindications, ultrasonography provides a cost-effective, albeit less sensitive, alternative. 6 Once identified, spinal dysraphisms warrant further neurological evaluation. If a defect associated with the spinal dysraphism is large enough, it can cause tethered cord syndrome, which presents with a constellation of neurological, orthopedic, and urologic symptoms. [1][2][3] Moreover, when the lesions of the spinal dysraphism provide direct conduits between the central nervous system and the skin surface, recurrent meningitis, often involving Staphylococcus aureus, can occur. 1,2 The present case highlights the importance of obtaining a complete history and cautions against blindly proceeding with a skin biopsy of a suspicious midline lesion without thoroughly reviewing all the possible etiologies of the lesion and carefully considering the potential implications of the biopsy. Clinicians should keep the cutaneous stigmata of spinal dysraphisms on their differential diagnoses of posterior midline or paraspinal lesions. Finally, although spinal dysraphisms most commonly present in neonates and young children, the diagnosis must also be considered in older adults, as this case illustrates.