2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.stomax.2007.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhinoplasties d’augmentation par greffons osseux calvariaux. Résultats à long terme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a lack of objective evidence in dorsal augmentation, but there are retrospective subjective reports of minimal absorption and satisfactory results in the vast majority of cranial bone grafts. 17,22,23 A respected surgeon’s opinion is valuable yet vulnerable to recall bias. Perhaps “satisfactory” means less than 25 percent resorption and perhaps “vast majority” means at least 80 percent.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Compared To Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of objective evidence in dorsal augmentation, but there are retrospective subjective reports of minimal absorption and satisfactory results in the vast majority of cranial bone grafts. 17,22,23 A respected surgeon’s opinion is valuable yet vulnerable to recall bias. Perhaps “satisfactory” means less than 25 percent resorption and perhaps “vast majority” means at least 80 percent.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Compared To Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous bone grafts are usually available in sufficient amount and provide adequate structural support to correct any stage of SND [40][41][42]. Calvarial bone [42][43][44][45][46][47], iliac crest [41,[48][49][50][51], inferior turbinate bone [52,53], olecranon process [54], vomer [40], and mastoid bone [55] were used as support grafts in rhinoplasty. In most of the subjected publications, favorable aesthetic and functional results with no evidence of bone graft infection, significant resorption, or migration are presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous cranial bone grafts harvested from the outer table of the parietal bone are commonly used in preimplant surgery for augmentation of the alveolar ridge (Baccar et al, 2005;Gutta and Waite, 2008;Iizuka et al, 2004), sinus floor elevation (Crespi et al, 2007;Le Lorc'h-Bukiet et al, 2005) and for other craniomaxillo-facial reconstructions (Emsen and Benlier, 2008;Himy et al, 2009;Siddique and Mathog, 2002;Wolfe et al, 2008) Removing bone from the parietal area decreases the thickness of the calvarium and may potentially affect the impact strength of the donor site. In a recent study, Torres-Lagares et al highlighted the low and stable remodelling in the parietal bone (Torres-Lagares et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%