“…Intramuscular live RV immunisation in a cotton rat model caused reduced virus titres upon subsequent homologous, but not heterologous HRV infection [10]. Limited neutralising antibody crossreactivity also required multiple adjuvanted immunisations plus infection in mice [30]. That high antigenic diversity should be a barrier to vaccine design is perhaps 84 Preventive and therapeutic vaccines (B Cell Epitope Vaccine) not surprising when one considers that those neutralising epitopes described [31,32] map to VP1, VP2 and VP3 capsid protein regions that recent full length HRV genome analyses have found to be the most highly variable (as indicated by the major troughs in Figure 1) [21,33 ].…”
A great burden of disease is attributable to human rhinovirus (HRV) infections which are the major cause of the common cold, exacerbations of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and are associated with asthma development. Despite this there is currently no vaccine for HRV. The first vaccine studies showed some promise in terms of serotype-specific protection against cold symptoms, but antigenic heterogeneity amongst the >150 HRVs has been regarded as a major barrier to effective vaccine development and has resulted in little progress over 50 years. Here we review those vaccine studies conducted to date, discuss the difficulties posed by antigenic heterogeneity and describe some recent advances in generating cross-reactive antibodies and T cell responses using peptide immunogens.
“…Intramuscular live RV immunisation in a cotton rat model caused reduced virus titres upon subsequent homologous, but not heterologous HRV infection [10]. Limited neutralising antibody crossreactivity also required multiple adjuvanted immunisations plus infection in mice [30]. That high antigenic diversity should be a barrier to vaccine design is perhaps 84 Preventive and therapeutic vaccines (B Cell Epitope Vaccine) not surprising when one considers that those neutralising epitopes described [31,32] map to VP1, VP2 and VP3 capsid protein regions that recent full length HRV genome analyses have found to be the most highly variable (as indicated by the major troughs in Figure 1) [21,33 ].…”
A great burden of disease is attributable to human rhinovirus (HRV) infections which are the major cause of the common cold, exacerbations of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and are associated with asthma development. Despite this there is currently no vaccine for HRV. The first vaccine studies showed some promise in terms of serotype-specific protection against cold symptoms, but antigenic heterogeneity amongst the >150 HRVs has been regarded as a major barrier to effective vaccine development and has resulted in little progress over 50 years. Here we review those vaccine studies conducted to date, discuss the difficulties posed by antigenic heterogeneity and describe some recent advances in generating cross-reactive antibodies and T cell responses using peptide immunogens.
“…Unfortunately, there are over 150 RV subtypes (66), and little cross-protection is afforded among subtypes after infection (67). The amino acid sequences of antigenic sites expressed on VP1 and other surface proteins have high intraspecies variability, but vaccination of mice with either VP2 plus VP4 antigens and adjuvant or VP1 antigens and adjuvant has produced cross-species neutralizing IgG antibodies (68,69). It is known that high homotypic antibody levels reduce symptoms on reexposure to a previously experienced strain (70), but it has been very difficult to generate cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies in humans up to this point.…”
Section: Rhinoviruses Asthma and Differential Interferon Productionmentioning
Human rhinoviruses are ubiquitous seasonal pathogens. They have known associations with first onset of wheezing illnesses in children and with asthma exacerbations in patients of all ages. It is not yet certain whether human rhinoviruses play a direct role in the pathogenesis of asthma by activating deleterious inflammatory responses or if they only serve as a catalyst to accelerate the disease in genetically predisposed individuals. There have been previously demonstrated reductions in the development of the asthmatic phenotype with passive immunization against respiratory syncytial virus; however, in the case of rhinovirus, there are barriers to effective vaccine development, such as the lack of a common antigenic target due to alterations of surface markers among subtypes. It remains to be determined whether certain subtypes of human rhinovirus are more asthmagenic and therefore worthy of greater attention as vaccine candidates, but several studies have suggested that RV-C and certain RV-A strains may be more strongly linked with asthma.
“…The recent development of a small animal model of RV infection [49] has improved investigations into potential RV therapeutic interventions and recently we have characterized the Ab responses in mice infected with RV and shown strong IgG responses to VP1 and that cross-serotype in vitro virus neutralization was generated [11]. Compared to studies in humans, this immunologically-naive model allows for simpler analyses of Ab responses without interference from Abs produced from previous encounters with RVs and may simplify the identification of novel potential prophylactic monoclonal Abs to RV through the use of mice transgenic for human immunoglobulin genes [50].…”
Section: Prophylactic Antibodies For Rhinovirusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have revealed that immunization of rabbits with recombinant VP1 generates antisera with broad cross-serotype neutralizing properties [13] and VP1 is the dominant target of Abs in both humans [12] and mice [11] following RV infection. VP1 is the central and most external of the RV capsid proteins, contains receptor binding sites for both the major and minor group RV [40], and has a high degree of amino acid identity within both type A and B RV serotypes [41,42].…”
Section: Antibody Responses To Rhinoviruses and Neutralizing Epitopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several Abs (approximately 10 of 200) are undergoing preclinical development or are in clinical trials for viral infectious diseases targets including HIV-1, HBV, human rhinoviruses (RV) and human cytomegalovirus [3]. RV may be particularly suited to the application of prophylactic Abs as no appropriate antiviral therapies are available despite numerous attempts [5][6][7], vaccine development faces challenging obstacles [8,9] and new information regarding protective antibody responses is being unearthed [10][11][12][13][14]. Thus, a full evaluation of the application of prophylactic Abs to these important human pathogens where there is an explicit need for appropriate therapeutic/ prophylactic interventions is warranted.…”
Rhinoviruses are extremely common pathogens of the upper respiratory tract with adults experiencing on average 2–5 infections per year and children up to 12 infections. Although infections are not life threatening, except in cases of chronic lung disease where rhinoviruses are the major precipitant of acute exacerbations of disease, there is a high associated economic cost resulting from lost productivity due to absence from work or school. Treatment of infections focuses on symptom relief with anti-pyretics/analgesics as there are no antiviral therapies available and vaccine strategies face difficulties because of the large number of viral serotypes. Here, we assess the potential for prophylactic antibody intervention for these ubiquitous human pathogens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.