1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01315018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhinoviruses: Kinetics of ultraviolet inactivation and effects of UV and heat on immunogenicity

Abstract: The kinetics of ultraviolet inactivation for two human rhinoviruses and poliovirus were compared. No major differences in the rates of ultraviolet inactivation were detectable. All viral preparations inactivated by ultraviolet irradiation induced neutralizing antibody in guinea pigs. In contrast, when guinea pigs were immunized with a heat inactivated rhinovirus preparation, little or no neutralizing antibody was elicited. Immune electron microscopy of the heated rhinovirus preparations revealed the presence o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the same immunization schedule with nonirradiated, intact virus resulted in an antibody recognition pattern similar to that of UV-inactivated virus (data not shown). This is consistent with the similar antibody responses to intact and to UV-inactivated rhinovirus and poliovirus, which are, however, different from the antibody response induced by heat-inactivated virus (20). Therefore, the predominance of antibody response appears to be influenced in our studies primarily by the route of immunization rather than by potential structural differences resulting from UV inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the same immunization schedule with nonirradiated, intact virus resulted in an antibody recognition pattern similar to that of UV-inactivated virus (data not shown). This is consistent with the similar antibody responses to intact and to UV-inactivated rhinovirus and poliovirus, which are, however, different from the antibody response induced by heat-inactivated virus (20). Therefore, the predominance of antibody response appears to be influenced in our studies primarily by the route of immunization rather than by potential structural differences resulting from UV inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Pretreatment with UV irradiation not only affected RV replication but also completely abolished cytokine production, including IL-1␤, in the present study. UV irradiation blocks RV replication but not the capability to enter the cells (11). In a previous report by Terajima et al (31), monoclonal antibodies to ICAM-1 completely blocked RV14 infection when human tracheal epithelial cells were exposed to RV14 for 15 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To confirm that increases in cytokine production by RV14 infection were due to the effects of RV14 infection and not a contaminant present in the viral stock, the ability of UVinactivated virus to induce cytokine production was also examined. UV inactivation was performed as previously described (11).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the ability of ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated virus to induce cytokine production was also examined. UV inactivation was performed as described previously (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%