2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0066-4103(07)63003-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhodium-103 NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 438 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36] This gives rise to chemical shift values in the range −9000 to −8000 ppm that can be converted and compared to the values ranging from −700 to +300 ppm relative to ( 103 Rh) = 3.16 MHz by using the formula reported by Carlton. [37] Crystal data of [Rh(COD)((S,S)-DIOP)]PF 6 …”
Section: Determination Of 103 Rh Chemical Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] This gives rise to chemical shift values in the range −9000 to −8000 ppm that can be converted and compared to the values ranging from −700 to +300 ppm relative to ( 103 Rh) = 3.16 MHz by using the formula reported by Carlton. [37] Crystal data of [Rh(COD)((S,S)-DIOP)]PF 6 …”
Section: Determination Of 103 Rh Chemical Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,44] Differences between the 183 W chemical shifts of the phosphine and phosphite complexes can be rationalized in terms of the weak/strong dimension, where P(OR) 3 provides a stronger ligand field than PR 3 , leading to larger E and lower δ. The trend to higher δ in the phosphine complexes occurs as the substituents on phosphorus become progressively less electron donating, i.e.…”
Section: X-ray Crystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the risk of further obscuring matters, a new chemical shift reference for organotungsten NMR of ( 183 W) = 4.15 MHz is proposed in the hope that it might enjoy the success of the comparable standard used in rhodium NMR. [31,32] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an effect (substituent R bonded to ligands other than pyridine) has been observed for complexes [Rh(η 5 ‐C 5 H 4 R)(CO) 2 ] and [W(CO) 4 (PPh 3 )(PR 3 )] and can be rationalized as follows. The two major influences on a transition metal chemical shift are (from a simplified form of the Ramsey equation) ΔE −1 , where ΔE is the energy difference between the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals, and < r −3 >, where r is the average radius of a d orbital . The ability of a ligand to increase the d orbital radius, r , is related to its polarizability (hard/soft property).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two major influences on a transition metal chemical shift are (from a simplified form of the Ramsey equation [29] ) ΔE À1 , where ΔE is the energy difference between the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals, and <r À3 >, where r is the average radius of a d orbital. [30] The ability of a ligand to increase the d orbital radius, r, is related to its polarizability (hard/soft property). For ligands that create a low ΔE, such as pyridine, which is a good s donor and poor p acceptor, polarizability effects will largely determine the value of the metal chemical shift.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%