2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.107.l020410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhombic skyrmion lattice coupled with orthorhombic structural distortion in EuAl4

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microscopic origin of the SkX is the synergy of the ferromagnetic exchange interaction, the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction [17,18], and the Zeeman coupling to the static magnetic field [19][20][21]. Recently, the SkXs with |n sk | = 1 were observed under the magnetic filed in materials with the inversion symmetry, such as Gd 2 PdSi 3 [9,10,22,23], Gd 3 Ru 4 Al 12 [24], GdRu 2 Si 2 [25][26][27], EuAl 4 [28][29][30][31][32], and GdRu 2 Ge 2 [33]. Since the DM interaction vanishes under the inversion symmetry, other microscopic origins have been theoretically proposed, such as competing exchange interactions [34], dipolar interactions [35,36], and biquadratic spin interactions [37,38] in addition to the Zeeman coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microscopic origin of the SkX is the synergy of the ferromagnetic exchange interaction, the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction [17,18], and the Zeeman coupling to the static magnetic field [19][20][21]. Recently, the SkXs with |n sk | = 1 were observed under the magnetic filed in materials with the inversion symmetry, such as Gd 2 PdSi 3 [9,10,22,23], Gd 3 Ru 4 Al 12 [24], GdRu 2 Si 2 [25][26][27], EuAl 4 [28][29][30][31][32], and GdRu 2 Ge 2 [33]. Since the DM interaction vanishes under the inversion symmetry, other microscopic origins have been theoretically proposed, such as competing exchange interactions [34], dipolar interactions [35,36], and biquadratic spin interactions [37,38] in addition to the Zeeman coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet EuAl 4 . In contrast to MnSi and Co 8 Zn 8 Mn 4 , two types of SkXs, which were identified as the S-SkX and a rhombic SkX, have been observed as thermodynamics phases by changing the magnetic field [30][31][32][33]. In this compound, the model calculations have shown that the competition of the interactions in momentum space that arise from the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction mediated by itinerant electrons [34][35][36] or frustrated exchange interactions plays an important role [30,32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to MnSi and Co 8 Zn 8 Mn 4 , two types of SkXs, which were identified as the S-SkX and a rhombic SkX, have been observed as thermodynamics phases by changing the magnetic field [30][31][32][33]. In this compound, the model calculations have shown that the competition of the interactions in momentum space that arise from the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction mediated by itinerant electrons [34][35][36] or frustrated exchange interactions plays an important role [30,32,33]. More recently, such structural transition of the equilibrium SkX phases has also been observed in a polar magnet EuNiGe 3 , where the long-range Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction [37,38], as well as the RKKY interaction, contributes to the emergence of the multiple SkXs [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, it has not been clarified the possibility of the SkXs under the in-plane field on a centrosymmetric square lattice, where the effect of geometrical frustration does not appear. Although the * hayami@phys.sci.hokudai.ac.jp emergence of the SkXs on such a square lattice in the out-of-plane magnetic field has been shown by the theoretical model calculations [31][32][33][34] and experiments in GdRu 2 Si 2 [15,[35][36][37][38][39] and EuAl 4 [40][41][42][43], its stabilization condition under the in-plane magnetic field has been unclear yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%