1989
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3201.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhyme Generation by Deaf Adults

Abstract: Congenitally, profoundly deaf college students were asked to generate rhymes to 50 target words. Results of the experiment indicated that it is possible for deaf individuals to develop the sensitivity to the phonologic structure of words necessary for rhyming: Approximately half of the responses generated were correct rhymes. Of these correct rhymes, the majority were orthographically similar to their target (e.g., BLUE-glue and TIE-lie), although 30% were orthographically dissimilar to their target (e.g., BLU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
91
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
91
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the rhyme constituent of the standard must be compared to the rhyme constituent of the target. The rhyme portion was spelt differently in nearly all the pairs, in order to avoid deaf subjects using a common strategy, which consisted that they based their decision on orthographic similarity (see Campbell & Wright, 1990;Charlier & Leybaert, 2000;Hanson & McGarr, 1989). In addition, the orthographic similarity between standard and target was held constant across rhyming and non-rhyming pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the rhyme constituent of the standard must be compared to the rhyme constituent of the target. The rhyme portion was spelt differently in nearly all the pairs, in order to avoid deaf subjects using a common strategy, which consisted that they based their decision on orthographic similarity (see Campbell & Wright, 1990;Charlier & Leybaert, 2000;Hanson & McGarr, 1989). In addition, the orthographic similarity between standard and target was held constant across rhyming and non-rhyming pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coding in short-term memory (Campbell & Wright, 1990), limited sensitivity to phonological effects in serial recall tasks (Campbell & Wright, 1990;Conrad, 1979), de®cits in rhyming (Campbell & Wright, 1988;Hanson & Fowler, 1987;Hanson & McGarr, 1989;Sterne, 1996), and little use of phoneme±grapheme correspondences in reading and spelling (Burden & Campbell, 1994;Harris & Beech, 1995;Leybaert & Alegria, 1995). This highlights the importance of the quality of the mental representations of speech.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For adjustment of calibration coefficients, Hanson [2] recommended for sandy beach that the values are typically in the ranges of 0.1 <K 1 < 1.0 and 0.5 K 1 <K 2 < 1.5 K 1 . This research tried some couples value of K 1 and K 2 for this calibration as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two numerical model which are well known for studies of shoreline change phenomena are GENESIS (GENEralized Model for Simulating Shoreline change) and LTC (Long-Term Configuration) [1]. The GENESIS model was developed to simulate long-term shoreline change on an open coast, produced by spatial and temporal differences in longshore sand transport [2], and it has been used since the late 1980's. The LTC model was firstly presented by Caelho et al [3].The GENESIS model has been successfully applied in many case studies of shoreline change phenomena especially for sandy beach [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation