2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rib and vertebral deformities in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) explained by a dominant-mutation mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both groups, we observed that the vertebral arches were not fully ossified, but no significant differences were observed in their mineralization status (Table 3). Furthermore, no obvious presence of ectopic cartilage or remodelling of the notochord was observed in either deformed or normal fish, as previously reported in severe compression type deformities in other salmonids [24,96,108].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In both groups, we observed that the vertebral arches were not fully ossified, but no significant differences were observed in their mineralization status (Table 3). Furthermore, no obvious presence of ectopic cartilage or remodelling of the notochord was observed in either deformed or normal fish, as previously reported in severe compression type deformities in other salmonids [24,96,108].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This difference in the percentage of incompletely hatched embryos could have several causes, e.g., the functionality of the hatching enzyme, the biochemical characteristics of the vitelline envelope or embryo movement (Kunz, 2004). Underlying these causes, variations in degree of heterozygosity or specific mutations could be involved (Boglione et al, 2014;Danzmann et al, 1986;Gislason et al, 2010). In particular, the incomplete hatching of embryos, with the head and yolk sac remaining encapsulated within the vitelline envelope, has been depicted as a consequence of acid stress by Sayer et al (1993), but here a stable pH was maintained throughout the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them have demonstrated that alterations on biotic and abiotic, physiological, xenobiotic, nutritional, and rearing factors can be responsible for the development of fish deformities at an early stage (Boglione et al, 2001;Bardon et al, 2009;Boglione and Costa, 2011;Prestinicola et al, 2013) or during their on-growing period (I. Lee-Montero, personal communication). Additionally, genetic factors are also possibly responsible for the prevalence of different skeletal deformities in different species: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar; Gjerde, 2005), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss; Kause et al, 2005;Gislason et al, 2010), Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua; Kolstad et al, 2006) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax; Bardon et al, 2009, Karahan et al, 2013. However, in gilthead seabream, only a few studies have proposed a genetic origin for some types of deformities (Afonso et al, 2000;Astorga et al, 2004;I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%