We report an 87-year-old woman with right ventricular perforation due to a permanent pacemaker lead detected 4-days after implantation. The pacemaker lead was seen to perforate through the myocardium and pericardium and to reach the left pleural cavity. We removed the wire surgically by median sternotomy. The pericardial effusion was cloudy and yellowish, suggesting infection. However, no bacteria were detected by bacterial cultures of the pericardial effusion and pacing wire. The patient developed neither mediastinitis nor sepsis after the operation, and a new pacemaker was implanted safely one month later.Keywords: permanent pacemaker, lead perforation, yellowish pericardial effusion tion, failure of the lead to pace or sense appropriately, erosions of the pulse generator, and subclavian vein thrombosis are well-recognized, delayed complications of cardiac devices implantation.2) The predictors of post-implantation pericardial effusion, which serves as a marker of perforation, include concomitant use of another transvenous device, steroid use within 7 days, and old age.
2)We report a case of the patient who presented with a lead perforation 4 days after pacemaker implantation. The pericardial effusion was cloudy and yellow, suggesting infection of the implanted pacemaker. However, bacterial cultures were negative.
CaseAn 87-year-old woman was followed at an outpatient psychiatric clinic for dementia. Five months prior to the present admission, her heart rate decreased, and she was diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome. A pacemaker was implanted from the left subclavian vein. An X-ray just after the operation showed the pacemaker wire to have been correctly placed. Slight redundancy of the pacing wire could be seen inside the superior vena cava (SVC). On the 2nd postoperative day (POD), she was delirious and moved her shoulders vigorously in circles throughout the night. On the 3rd POD, she had the symptom of