Summary. There was a 6 to 24-hotr lag in the production of anthocyanins in the l:ght after excision of 4-day-old etiolated internodes of Sorghum vu'g(gre variety Whea&-> land milo. In internodes infiltrated with water, ap geninidin was formed first at 19 'o 24 hours and continued to be produced slowly. Luteolinidin was formed slightly later, but its formation rapidly exceeded that of apigeninidin. Cyanidin was the last type to be produced, but equaled the amounts of luteolinidin by 4 days. In noninfiltrated internodes, the production of cyanidin was greatly accelerated, beginning at about 6 hours.Data from experiments with inhibitors that presui-ably affect protein synthesis at different loci indicated that protein synthesis was necessary for maximum production of all 3 anthocyanins, but that {different steps were rate limiting. Light independent synthesis of ap:geninidin and luteolinidin was inh:;Wted by chloramphencol and L-ethionine but not by actinomycin D and 8-azaguanine. liowever, the synthesis of these 2 anthocyanins was not inhibited 'by puromycin, but was sometimes stimulated. The lightinduced synthesis of cyanidin was inhibited by actinomycin, azaguanine, chloramphenicol and ethionine. Actionmycin no longer was inhib tory if added after incubation for 6 hours in air. All inhibi'tors were capable of inhibiting to various degrees either the incorporation of 14C-uracil into RNA or 14C-leucine into protein. The inhibitor data suggest that the light insensitive synthesis of apIgeninidin andl ltteolinidin may be controlled by enzyme synthesis at the level of ribosomes via stable mRNA, while the light-induced production of cyanidin is dependent initially on the production of mRNA. The latter hypothesis is similar to that recently proposed by Lange and Mohr for a cyanidin produced in Siniapis seedlings.