2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702269104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ribonucleoprotein-masked nicks at 50-kbp intervals in the eukaryotic genomic DNA

Abstract: By using a microscopic approach, field inversion single-cell gel electrophoresis, we show that preformed single-strand discontinuities are present in the chromatin of resting and proliferating mammalian and yeast cells. These single-strand breaks are primarily nicks positioned at Ϸ50-kbp intervals throughout the entire genome that could be efficiently labeled in situ by DNA polymerase I holoenzyme but not by Klenow fragment and terminal transferase unless after ribonucleolytic treatments. The RNA molecules inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above examples clearly illustrate the massive progress in the field that has been driven by technological advancements of Rloop detection methods. These techniques involve, for instance, electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Yu et al 2006), atomic force microscopy (Brown et al 2008), transmission electron microscopy (Pohjoismäki et al 2010), fluorescent microscopy (Székvölgyi et al 2007), fluorescence in situ hybridization (Nadel et al 2015), native bisulfite modification (Yu et al 2003), immunoprecipitation (Skourti-Stathaki et al 2011;Ginno et al 2012), and computational prediction (Jenjaroenpun et al 2015). The increasing numbers of R-loop mapping data relied on a single approach, DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) and its variations (RDIP, DRIPc, S1-DRIP, DRIP-RNA, DIP, ChIP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above examples clearly illustrate the massive progress in the field that has been driven by technological advancements of Rloop detection methods. These techniques involve, for instance, electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Yu et al 2006), atomic force microscopy (Brown et al 2008), transmission electron microscopy (Pohjoismäki et al 2010), fluorescent microscopy (Székvölgyi et al 2007), fluorescence in situ hybridization (Nadel et al 2015), native bisulfite modification (Yu et al 2003), immunoprecipitation (Skourti-Stathaki et al 2011;Ginno et al 2012), and computational prediction (Jenjaroenpun et al 2015). The increasing numbers of R-loop mapping data relied on a single approach, DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) and its variations (RDIP, DRIPc, S1-DRIP, DRIP-RNA, DIP, ChIP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R-loops can now be effectively mapped with high-throughput methods that are based on the specific recognition of RNA-DNA hybrids by the S9.6 antibody [14,15]. The antibody was recently used to detect and localize DNA—RNA hybrids that have been linked to genomic instability, at CpG island promoters, terminator regions and genomic regions with altered chromatin structure [1619] [9,20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in these cells terminal differentiation is linked to induction of DNA strands breaks that preferentially occur at sites involving MARs, liberating DNA fragments of some 50 kbp, that roughly correspond to the average distribution of chromatin looped domains [88]. Indeed, ribo-nucleoprotein-masked nicks exist in the genome distributed on average every 50 kbp, suggesting that eukaryotic genomic DNA is composed of contiguous rather than continuous single strands, interrupted at the boundaries of interphase chromatin loops [89]. This fact supports the notion that attachment to the NM contributes to stabilize the long-range DNA structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%