The functional peculiarities of ram mutants correlate with an observed alteration in chromatographic mobility of P4a, a specific protein of the 30S ribosomal subunit. This finding is supported by ribosomnal reconstitution experiments. These facts, together with the known location of the ram mutational site in the vicinity of other 30S genetic determinants, suggest that ram is the structural gene for P4a.The known contrasting roles of ram and strA in determining translational efficiency require that the function of P4a should be explained in relation to PlO (the 30S-subunit protein defined by strA). One consequence of altering P4a, a key protein in ribosome assembly, might be to change the interaction of PlO with the 30S subunit. The functional interrelationship of P4a and PlO is discussed in terms of the possible roles of these two proteins in regulating access of tRNA molecules to the decoding site.A mutation isolated by selection for increased translational ambiguity in Escherichia coli B was found to alter the 30S ribosomal subunit. Strains bearing this lesion, which maps in the strA region, have ribosomes that allow translation of synthetic mRNAs with a level of misreading significantly higher than ribosomes from parental strains; this capacity was shown to be a property of the mutant 30S subunit by exchange of 30S and 50S particles from mutant and parental ribosomes. The new mutation was accordingly called ram, for ribosomal ambiguity (1).A more general interpretation of the nature of ram mutants, however, emerges from a consideration of the procedure used in their selection. The parent was an argF amber mutant whose nutritional block was incomplete due to limited or "leaky" translation through the nonsense codon (2). In the first step of the selection, the strain was made strictly auxotrophic by introducing strAl, a mutant allele of the gene specifying the 30S ribosomal protein P10 (3), known to restrict intrinsic nonsense leakiness (4). In the second step, spontaneous mutants were sought in which the nutritional leakiness of the original parent reappeared. Given the nature of the selection, it is quite possible that ram determines a 30S ribosomal component that does not, in itself, govern translational ambiguity, but which in some way opposes the translational restriction imposed by the strA mutation.This view is supported by the fact that the ram/strA interaction is not limited to translational ambiguity. A further aspect of the phenotype, which seems more general, is that the ram mutation reverses the restriction imposed by strA alleles on the suppression efficiency of mutated tRNAs (4, T). This reversal cannot be attributed to increased ambiguity, as demonstrated in the case of missense suppression; if ram were to introduce ambiguity, a further reduction, rather than an increase, in suppression efficiency would be expected, since the insertion of a specific amino acid is required to correct a missense mutation and restore functional activity to the gene product.The contrasting influence on tra...