2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ribosomal proteins: Toward a next generation standard for prokaryotic systematics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, using a concatenated sequence based on a full set of ribosomal proteins has become a common approach to resolve Fournier and Gogarten, 2010;Lasek-Nesselquist and Gogarten, 2013). The major advantage of using these proteins as phylogenomic markers for prokaryotic organisms is that these genes are rarely subject to horizontal gene transfer (Ciccarelli et al, 2006;Ramulu et al, 2014), which has been generally accepted as the prevalent source of error in prokaryotic systematics (Bapteste and Boucher, 2008). Results from the current study showing different branching patterns depending on which ribosomal proteins are used caution against their indiscriminate use for systematics of Proteobacteria and perhaps other prokaryotic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, using a concatenated sequence based on a full set of ribosomal proteins has become a common approach to resolve Fournier and Gogarten, 2010;Lasek-Nesselquist and Gogarten, 2013). The major advantage of using these proteins as phylogenomic markers for prokaryotic organisms is that these genes are rarely subject to horizontal gene transfer (Ciccarelli et al, 2006;Ramulu et al, 2014), which has been generally accepted as the prevalent source of error in prokaryotic systematics (Bapteste and Boucher, 2008). Results from the current study showing different branching patterns depending on which ribosomal proteins are used caution against their indiscriminate use for systematics of Proteobacteria and perhaps other prokaryotic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In standard microbial phylogenomic analyses, however, proteins are often selected based on their functional conservation instead of compositional homogeneity in order to minimize the impact of lateral gene transfer on the resulting phylogeny [83,84]. Therefore, a second approach is to employ an appropriate model to account for the compositional bias contained in a gene family data set that is composition-blind.…”
Section: Microscale Heterogeneity and Ecological Strategies Of Marinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference phylogenies of Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Enterobacteriaceae strains contained in our local database were inferred using ribosomal proteins as suggested elsewhere (Ramulu et al, 2014). The reference tree of Firmicutes has been rooted according to a recent study (Antunes et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference phylogenies of species containing Ldc, Adc or Odc homologues were inferred using ribosomal proteins as suggested elsewhere (Ramulu et al ., 2014). Ribosomal protein sequences from the complete proteomes of these species were identified using the RiboDB database engine (Jauffrit et al ., 2016) and aligned with MAFFT using the L-INS-i option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%