2021
DOI: 10.3390/plants10081625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice Ear Counting Based on Image Segmentation and Establishment of a Dataset

Abstract: The real-time detection and counting of rice ears in fields is one of the most important methods for estimating rice yield. The traditional manual counting method has many disadvantages: it is time-consuming, inefficient and subjective. Therefore, the use of computer vision technology can improve the accuracy and efficiency of rice ear counting in the field. The contributions of this article are as follows. (1) This paper establishes a dataset containing 3300 rice ear samples, which represent various complex s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating yield by deep learning is highly accurate and robust. Shao et al [ 7 ] used the LC-FCN model to detect and count rice ears, and Wu et al [ 8 ] used image processing techniques and deep learning to count the number of rice grains. Lu et al [ 9 ] proposed TasselNet to detect and count maize tassels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating yield by deep learning is highly accurate and robust. Shao et al [ 7 ] used the LC-FCN model to detect and count rice ears, and Wu et al [ 8 ] used image processing techniques and deep learning to count the number of rice grains. Lu et al [ 9 ] proposed TasselNet to detect and count maize tassels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine vision-based deep learning methods have provided advanced and efficient image processing solutions in agriculture. Deep learning methods, combined with machine vision technology, have been widely used in plant disease and pest classification, including the classification of fresh tobacco leaves of various maturity levels ( Chen et al., 2021 ); the classification of tobacco plant diseases ( Lin et al., 2022 ); the classification of wheat spike blast ( Fernández-Campos et al., 2021 ); the classification of rice pests and diseases ( Yang et al., 2021 ); the detection of plant parts such as tobacco leaves and stems ( Li et al., 2021 ); the detection of tomato diseases ( Liu et al., 2022 ); the detection of wheat head diseases ( Gong et al., 2020 ); the detection of brown planthoppers in rice ( He et al., 2020 ); plant image segmentation, such as tobacco planting areas segmentation ( Huang et al., 2021 ); field-grown wheat spikes segmentation ( Tan et al., 2020 ); rice ear segmentation ( Bai-yi et al., 2020 ; Shao et al., 2021 ); rice lodging segmentation ( Su et al., 2022 ); photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetation segmentation ( He et al., 2022 ); weed and crop segmentation ( Hashemi-Beni et al., 2022 ); and wheat spike segmentation ( Wen et al., 2022 ). Deep learning methods combined with machine vision technology have been utilized in research focused on the classification of tobacco shred images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al (2020) used the FPN-Mask (feature pyramid network mask) method to segment rice panicles with an accuracy of 0.99; however, the effect of rice panicle type on segmentation accuracy was not considered. Shao et al (2021) proposed a localization-based FCN combined with a watershed algorithm for dense rice panicle recognition and counting, with an accuracy of 89.88%. The aforementioned study that uses image segmentation for the actual panicle detection counts, as well as for investigating the effect of spike type on panicle detection, has limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) used the FPN-Mask (feature pyramid network mask) method to segment rice panicles with an accuracy of 0.99; however, the effect of rice panicle type on segmentation accuracy was not considered. Shao et al. (2021) proposed a localization-based FCN combined with a watershed algorithm for dense rice panicle recognition and counting, with an accuracy of 89.88%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%