1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92396-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice-Powder Electrolyte Solution as Oral Therapy in Diarrhoea Due to Vibrio Cholerae and Escherichia Coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, glucose was the first carbohydrate to be used (Desjeux et al, 1994). Then, rice (Molla et al, 1982;Gore et al, 1992;Desjeux et al, 1994;Dutta et al, 2000) and more recently amylase-resistant starch (ARS) (Ramakrishna et al, 2000Raghupathy et al, 2006) added to glucose ORS has proven to be more effective than glucose ORS without ARS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, glucose was the first carbohydrate to be used (Desjeux et al, 1994). Then, rice (Molla et al, 1982;Gore et al, 1992;Desjeux et al, 1994;Dutta et al, 2000) and more recently amylase-resistant starch (ARS) (Ramakrishna et al, 2000Raghupathy et al, 2006) added to glucose ORS has proven to be more effective than glucose ORS without ARS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3 An alternative approach, currently employed in oral rehydration products used in human patients, is to avoid the ''osmotic penalty'' of increased glucose content by providing the carbohydrate in polysaccharide form, replacing the glucose with rice powder. 1,4,5 Studies in human patients have shown successful rehydration and reduced stool output after treatment with rice-based products. 6 Rice-based products are not widely used in bovine medicine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Cochrane review concluded that glucose polymer (i.e., starch)-based ORS resulted in a reduced first day diarrhoea output and a reduced diarrhoea duration compared with glucose-based ORS when diarrhoea aetiology was not considered (Gregorio et al, 2016). Furthermore, several (Molla et al, 1982(Molla et al, , 1985(Molla et al, , 1989Alam et al, 1992), but not all (Hossain et al, 2003) clinical trials from Bangladesh showed a reduced stool output in patients with cholera treated with a starchcompared with a glucose-based ORS. As intestinal streptococci cannot digest starch, polymer ORS might have its beneficial effect by suppressing the intestinal streptococcal outgrowth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%