Rice root-knot nematode (<i>Meloidogyne graminicola</i>) infestation in rice

Jain, Ramesh K.; Khan, Matiyar Rahaman; Kumar, Vinod

doi:10.1080/03235408.2011.588059

Cited by 53 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This endoparasitic sedentary nematode species occurs in all South and Southeast Asian rice-producing countries surveyed so far [2]. It can be found in a wide range of rice-based production systems, including lowland as well as upland, irrigated as well as rainfed, and deepwater rice [3–7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

QTL mapping for resistance to and tolerance for the rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola is an obligate biotrophic pathogen considered to be the most damaging nematode species that causes significant yield losses to upland and rainfed lowland rice production in South and Southeast Asia. Mapping and identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to and tolerance for M. graminicola may offer a safe and economic management option to farmers. In this study, resistance to and tolerance for M. graminicola in Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.) were studied in a mapping population consisting of 300 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from IR78877–208-B-1-2, an aerobic rice genotype with improved resistance to and tolerance for M. graminicola, and IR64, a popular, high-yielding rice mega-variety susceptible to M. graminicola. RILs were phenotyped for resistance and tolerance in the dry seasons of 2012 and 2013. QTL analysis was performed using 131 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and 33 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers.ResultsThree QTLs with main effects on chromosomes 4 (qMGR4.1), 7 (qMGR7.1) and 9 (qMGR9.1) and two epistatic interactions (qMGR3.1/ qMGR11.1 and qMGR4.2/ qMGR8.1) associated with nematode reproduction that were consistent in the two seasons were detected. A QTL affecting root galling was found on chromosomes 4 (qGR4.1) and 8 (qGR8.1), and QTLs for nematode tolerance were found on chromosomes 5 (qYR5.1) and 11 (qYR11.1). These QTLs were consistent in both seasons. A QTL for grain yield was found on chromosome 10 (qGYLD10.1), a QTL affecting filled grains per panicle was detected on chromosome 11 (qFG11.1) and a QTL for fresh root weight was found on chromosomes 2 (qFRWt2.1), 8 (qFRWt8.1) and 12 (qFRWt12.1) in both seasons. The donor of the alleles for qMGR4.1, qMGR7.1, qMGR9.1, qGR4.1, qGR8.1, qYR5.1 and qFRWt2.1 was IR78877–208-B-1-2, whereas for qYR11.1, qGYLD10.1 and qFG11.1, qFRWt8.1 and qFRWt12.1 was IR64. Lines having favorable alleles for resistance, tolerance and yield provided better yield under nematode-infested conditions and could be a starting point of marker-assisted breeding (MAB) for the improvement of M. graminicola resistance and tolerance in Asian rice.ConclusionThis study identified a total of 12 QTLs with main effects and two epistatic interactions in the 1st season and 2nd season related to M. graminicola resistance and tolerance, and other agronomic traits such as plant yield, percentage of filled grains, and fresh and dry root weight. Rice genotypes that have the favorable alleles for resistance (qMGR4.1, qMGR7.1, qMGR9.1, qGR4.1, qGR8.1) and tolerance (qYR5.1, and qYR11.1,) QTLs, and which are either resistant or partially resistant and tolerant, were also selected. These selected genotypes and the identified QTLs are vital information in designing MAB for the improvement of high-yielding rice genotypes but are susceptible to M. graminicola infection.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12863-018-0656-1) contains supplementary material, which is availa...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

QTL mapping for resistance to and tolerance for the rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Crop rotation, fallowing, flooding and the use of nematicides are practices that are often used to manage plant-parasitic nematodes in infested rice fields (Jain et al 2012;De Waele et al 2013). Rotating upland rice with inter alia mung bean (Ventura et al 1981), mustard, sesame, millet or guzitil (Guizotia abbysinica) can effectively decrease the populations of M. graminicola and reduce yield losses (Rahman 1990) but the feasibility of controlling M. graminicola by crop rotation has been reported to be limited because of the wide host range of this nematode species.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, there have been few options for chemical control of nematodes in general since the application of 1,2-di-bromo-3-chloropropane and ethylene di-bromide was banned (Boerma & Hussey 1992). Other management strategies mentioned in the literature (Jain et al 2012) are mostly nursery bed-orientated such as nursery bed solarisation or treatment with carbofuran, Pseudomonas fluorescens and neem. Within this context, the search for rice varieties that are either resistant or tolerant to M. graminicola may offer an alternative to manage this nematode species, especially, when less water is available for rice production and when the rice is direct seeded.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the host response of lowland and upland rice varieties from Myanmar to the rice root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne graminicola

Win

Kyi

Maung

et al. 2013

Archives Of Phytopathology And Plant Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rice root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola is considered one of the most potentially important nematode pathogens of rice, especially in South and Southeast Asia, in a range of rice production systems. Identification of M. graminicola-resistant or -tolerant rice varieties will enable breeding programmes to develop rice varieties which are able to limit yield losses caused by this nematode species. The host response to M. graminicola infection of 15 lowland rice varieties and 9 upland rice varieties, which are being grown in the summer-irrigated lowland and rainfed upland rice ecosystems in Myanmar, was evaluated in two experiments under screenhouse conditions. The lowland rice experiment was carried out under intermittently flooded conditions in a clay loam soil (i.e. simulating the summer-irrigated lowland rice ecosystem) and the upland rice experiment was carried out at field capacity in a sandy loam soil (i.e. simulating the monsoon rainfed upland rice ecosystem). None of the15 lowland and 9 upland rice varieties were resistant to M. graminicola infection although differences in susceptibility and sensitivity were observed. Six (or 40%) out of the 15 lowland varieties examined were classified as less susceptible (LS) to M. graminicola infection, five (or 33.3%) as moderately susceptible (MS) while four (or 26.7%) as highly susceptible (HS). One (or 11.1%) out of the nine upland varieties examined was classified as LS to M. graminicola infection, three (or 33.3%) as MS while five (or 55.6%) as HS. Five (or 33.3%) out of the 15 lowland varieties examined were classified as either less sensitive or tolerant to M. graminicola infection. One (or 11.1%) out of the nine upland varieties examined was classified as tolerant to M. graminicola infection. This study offers interesting information for the farmer regarding which rice variety should be grown in M. graminicola-infested fields under either lowland or upland conditions.

show abstract

“…In India, it was observed for the first time in 1969 in association with rice (Patnaik, 1969). Initially, it was confined to West Bengal, Odisha, Assam, and Kerala states, but of late, it has spread to Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Gujarat (Prasad et al, 1987;Jain et al, 2012). Infestations are particularly severe where two crops of rice are taken in a year, or where graminaceous weeds are abundant between two rice crops (Pankaj et al, 2010).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphological, Morphometric, and Molecular Characterization of Intraspecific Variations within Indian Populations of Meloidogyne graminicola

Salalia

Walia

Somvanshi

et al. 2017

Journal of Nematology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fourteen populations of Meloidogyne graminicola were collected from different agroecological regions of India. Morphological and morphometrical comparisons were made for various nematode life stages. Three populations (Hisar, New Delhi, and Samastipur) were different from typical M. graminicola on the basis of the length of eggs; J2 length, a-value, hyaline tail portion; male length, distance up to excretory pore, spicule and gubernaculum lengths; female length and width, stylet length, distance up to excretory pore, EPST (distance of excretory pore from anterior end / stylet length [females]) ratio, and vulval length. Morphological and morphometrical comparison with closely related species M. graminis, M. oryzae, M. salasi, M. triticoryzae, and M. lini clustered these populations into two groups: Anand, Bhubaneswar, Hyderabad, Jammu, Jorhat, Kalyani, Kanpur, Ludhiana, Mandya, Palampur, Vellayani grouped with M. graminicola, M. triticoryzae and M. salasi; whereas, Hisar, New Delhi, Samastipur grouped with M. oryzae and M. graminis. Molecular phylogenetic analysis using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) suggested that in spite of morphological differences, these populations belonged to M. graminicola.

show abstract

Rice root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne graminicola) infestation in rice

Cited by 53 publications

References 5 publications

QTL mapping for resistance to and tolerance for the rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola

QTL mapping for resistance to and tolerance for the rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola

Evaluation of the host response of lowland and upland rice varieties from Myanmar to the rice root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne graminicola

Morphological, Morphometric, and Molecular Characterization of Intraspecific Variations within Indian Populations of Meloidogyne graminicola

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About