2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.636622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riches to Rags Every Month? The Fall in Consumption Expenditures between Paydays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these recipients, distance from the bank may act as a commitment device and help to prevent this behavior. These findings are conceptually consistent with Huffman and Barenstein (2004); Mastrobuoni and Weinberg (2009); Shapiro (2005). However, junk food represents only 8% of total food consumption and distance from a bank branch does not significantly affect overall food consumption smoothing.…”
Section: Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For these recipients, distance from the bank may act as a commitment device and help to prevent this behavior. These findings are conceptually consistent with Huffman and Barenstein (2004); Mastrobuoni and Weinberg (2009); Shapiro (2005). However, junk food represents only 8% of total food consumption and distance from a bank branch does not significantly affect overall food consumption smoothing.…”
Section: Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The literature suggests that more frequent transfers (Shapiro 2005;Mastrobuoni and Weinberg 2009) or in-kind transfers (Huffman and Barenstein 2004) may help recipients smooth consumption in the presence of time-inconsistent preferences. Our results suggest that reducing the transfer liquidity may also improve consumption smoothing for some households.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the transfer between accounts matters, even though the money is theoretically fungible (abstracting from transaction costs). Thaler (1985) and Shefrin and Thaler (1988) pioneered the mental accounting literature, and several studies provide additional empirical evidence (Huffman and Barenstein, 2005; Abeler and Marklein, 2008; Choi, Laibson, and Madrian, 2009; Milkman and Beshears, 2009; Feldman, 2010; Karle, Kirchsteiger, and Peitz, 2015). In the domain of stock market investments, mental accounts are a necessary ingredient to explain the disposition effect (Odean, 1998), that is, the empirical phenomenon whereby investors hold on to unrealized capital losses.…”
Section: Mechanisms and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We run balanced tests to ensure the random assignment of interview dates to respondents over the month. This approach allows us to obtain the causal estimate of the effect of income fluctuation around payday on the risk 1 See, for example, studies in the US (Wilde and Ranney 2000;Stephens 2003;Shapiro 2005;Mastrobuoni and Weinberg 2009;Hastings and Washington 2010) and the UK (Huffman and Barenstein 2005;Stephens 2006). 2 E.g., Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) in the US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%