2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00316.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ridge Alterations following Immediate Implant Placement and the Treatment of Bone Defects with Bio‐Oss in an Animal Model

Abstract: The findings from this study demonstrated that the placement of implants and Bio-Oss® particles into fresh extraction sockets resulted in significant buccal bone loss with low osseointegration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, De Santis and colleagues, in a study that compared implants placed in sites previously augmented with a DBBM block or autogenous bone blocks, reported extensive height resorption in bony ridges grafted with a DBBM block. Some studies emphasize the benefits brought by the use of a DBBM sponge or DBBM granules in minimizing remodeling effects in the bone crest, while others report limited influence on this process . The three biomaterials used in our study were superior to autogenous bone in the vertical preservation of the distal bone crest at 8 and 16 weeks with and without the use of a membrane ( p < .05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In contrast, De Santis and colleagues, in a study that compared implants placed in sites previously augmented with a DBBM block or autogenous bone blocks, reported extensive height resorption in bony ridges grafted with a DBBM block. Some studies emphasize the benefits brought by the use of a DBBM sponge or DBBM granules in minimizing remodeling effects in the bone crest, while others report limited influence on this process . The three biomaterials used in our study were superior to autogenous bone in the vertical preservation of the distal bone crest at 8 and 16 weeks with and without the use of a membrane ( p < .05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The 'early delayed' implant placement, 4 weeks after tooth extraction, significantly reduced overall treatment time for patients. Hsu et al (22) described increased bone loss on buccal aspects with low osseointegration when immediate implant placement protocol was used, although, other studies have argued that crestal bone loss after immediate implant placement with/without bone grafting is clinically acceptable (6,23). Considering the results of a recent review aiming to determine the influence of platform switching on periimplant bone loss, the implants that followed delayed placement protocol showed less crestal bone resorption than implants that were placed immediately after extraction (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, immediate implant placement, especially with xenograft bone graft, showed an increase in bone loss on buccal aspects with low osseointegration. 21 Block et al 22 compared hard and soft tissue response to immediate and delayed placement of an implant in the maxillary anterior region with immediate provisionalization. This study concluded that the hard tissue change was similar in two groups, however, 1 mm more facial gingival margin was preserved on immediate implant with provisionalization.…”
Section: Immediate Implantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Immediate implant placement with provisionalization seems to preserve soft tissue with possible negative effects on bone loss. [21][22] Although, some argue that the crestal bone loss after immediate implant placement with/without bone grafting are clinically acceptable. [23][24][25] Therefore, evaluation for the appropriateness of immediate implant should be individually assessed in order to provide the best outcome.…”
Section: Immediate Implantmentioning
confidence: 99%