2020
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riding an elephant: A qualitative study of nurses' moral journeys in the context of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD)

Abstract: Aims and objectives To describes nurses' moral experiences with Medical Assistance in Dying in the Canadian context. Background Nurses perform important roles in Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada and do so within a unique context in which Medical Assistance in Dying is provided through healthcare services and where accessibility is an important principle. International literature indicates that participating in Medical Assistance in Dying can be deeply impactful for nurses and requires a high degree of mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
53
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants also suggested that there was a component of the act that should never feel normal and they continued to feel the emotional impact, similar to what Flemish nurses reported many years after the legalization of euthanasia in Belgium [38]. These findings of calibration stand in contrast to our earlier interviews with nurses, conducted shortly after the legalization of MAID, in which participants described an unprepared healthcare system that left them with few practice supports to do the morally complex work that was required with this new legal responsibility [19,25,27].…”
Section: Cultural Calibrationsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants also suggested that there was a component of the act that should never feel normal and they continued to feel the emotional impact, similar to what Flemish nurses reported many years after the legalization of euthanasia in Belgium [38]. These findings of calibration stand in contrast to our earlier interviews with nurses, conducted shortly after the legalization of MAID, in which participants described an unprepared healthcare system that left them with few practice supports to do the morally complex work that was required with this new legal responsibility [19,25,27].…”
Section: Cultural Calibrationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Accessibility to MAID was influenced by the sometime contentious relationship between those care providers involved in MAID and those in palliative care [19,22,23]. There was a need to support healthcare providers involved in MAID in light of the emotional impact [20,24,25] and a need to provide healthcare providers with the knowledge and skills to assist with, or to assess and provide, MAID, particularly in light of vague eligibility criteria [20,26,27]. There was also a need to manage the relational challenges that arose between those who saw MAID as an acceptable moral option and those who did not [19-21, 25, 26].…”
Section: Request Signed By One Independent Witnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They explained that the motivations for participation could be categorized into (a) personal values and identity, (b) professional values and identity, (c) experience with death and dying, and (d) influencing all the social contexts where MAID occurs. Pesut, Thorne, Storch, et al (2020) noted that willingness to participate in MAID was influenced by nurses' (a) family and community influences, (b) professional experiences, and (c) proximity to the act of MAID. Our results (related to both the endogenous and exogenous factors) align with these studies as individuals are choosing their degree of MAID participation based on organizational factors, family and community factors, previous personal and professional experiences, and their values individuals and professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only is MAiD a radical practice change, but it is also morally contentious, and hence potentially divisive for nurses. For example, nurses have variously described MAiD as transforming their experiences of vicarious suffering in practice or as a morally wrong act in which they never imagined they would be asked to participate (Pesut, Thorne, Storch, et al, 2020). Such radical and morally divisive practice changes allow us the opportunity to identify and explore nursing’s unique angle of vision (Thorne, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a primary qualitative study of nurses’ experiences. Other papers from this dataset discuss nurses’ moral sense-making (Pesut, Thorne, Storch, et al, 2020) and policy and health system issues that affect their practice (Pesut, Thorne, Schiller, et al, 2020). In this article, we report on the qualitative findings that describe how nurses construct good nursing practice within the context of this new end-of-life option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%